>Pic Changes of being natural (claims so) with over than

>>41010716
25% chance he's natty

>>41010716
depends, if he started early and is in his early to mid 30s it could be legit. if he is 40+ he is juicing.

possible with great genetics, unlikely without it

juice! wtf is wrong with you faggots? how can you not know this yet... am i being trolled?

You're retarded he could be natty but it all depends on his motabalism, food he eats, time im gym etc.

He could do nothing n eat like shit yet maintain due to roids.

Or he could be a gym junkie and go gym all the time.

>>41010716
That is achievable natty with good genetics and proper diet combined with years of consistent trainigng, 3/3 things no one on /fit/ has or does

>>41010741
>>41010783
nonlifting fags

What the fuck kind of thread is this?
All you have to do is look at his traps and delts to see, not to mention this is obviously taken in a gym locker room after a workout where he has a pump, of course it's natural.

>>41010716
yeah he is natty, looking at some replies makes me think this board has more fat people than persons who actually been lifting more than 3 years..

Depends how much he weighs and height...
If he's 5'10 and 190lbs then probably not natty..

But if hes 5'10 and 170lbs then he could easily be natty.

He obviously has a serious pump in the pic, which makes people look twice as good as usual. Obviously ideal lighting, obviously ideal posing (elbows pulled back to emphasize shoulders and traps, abs flexed like fuck)

We can't say either way without knowing his weight.

>>41012824
https://youtu.be/KilUi7kMXVk?t=1815 this is him and he's like 188cm