>tfw 6'3, 198lbs >tfw everyone keeps telling me i

dude you post all the time, you're bloated from bulking, not much beyond that. I'm your height and have it too, you'll probably be down to 180-185 again if you decided to cut to 12%

6'4, 200 here. You definitely look like you could weigh that much. What are you going to trust? Your own eyes and the scale, or a bunch of basement dwellers on a Surinamese appliance repairs forum?

File: xc.jpg (60KB, 587x480px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 587x480px

>>40952335
also, bodyweight is a shit indicator for size without stating bodyfat, so don't bulk for a specific bodyweight because taller guys can look skinnyfat even at 225+

pic is what 6'2" 190 can look like while totally shredded, yet the same guy maintains at 210-215 while still lean

File: IMG_20170402_183914.jpg (386KB, 1331x1596px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1331x1596px

IKTFB, 6'0 200 lbs.

>>40952281
same height and i look bigger than that, but i weigh only 150 lbs. I've never broken anything, and im fit. about 10% bodyfat. i dont understand

File: c1a8951fa015ec5015a5f381454d2506.jpg (14KB, 236x366px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 236x366px

also 6'4" 185-190 half natty jon skywalker from a few years ago in pic related could easily be 220-230 with the same muscle mass in this picture, just with more water weight and slightly more bf%.

Don't even look at weight standards, it fluctuates quite a bit for taller people

>>40952335
>all the time
I posted a total of 4-5 times maybe
And i dont plan on cutting that soon, i wanna be thicc
>>40952394
I have a hard time believing that someone who weighs 70kg at 190cm looks bigger than me. Post your pic please.

>>40952417
Remember these roiders also dont work their legs to the same degree so they have proportionally more muscle mass in their upper body.

>>40952701
jon skywalker has ok legs
>>40952643
it's nothing outrageous, I remember back when I was 77 kg 10-11% at 191 cm (which is about 6 years ago) I had 39 cm (15.5") arms, same as you said to have right now, though mine looked more vascular back then

>>40952828
also thicc is the way to go man, I think the highest I went is 230 15-16% after my first proper bulk but I guess as a natty you can get close to 250 like boardshorts, though in the 15-18% range. At low bodyfat however, above say 210-215 at 10% is very rare for a natural to exceed, I remember the tripfag bully (the one that did g4p shit) was 6'4" ~240+ most of the time and cut down to 210 without being that dry

I have a friend who weighs 210 and has 12" arms and no beer belly that I've seen and is 2 inches shorter than me.
I'm 6'3" with 16" arms and I'm 182ish.

shit varies a ton.

>>40952281
Fuck. Im 6'4 shooting for 200. I dunno how the hell Im going to look if that's type case.

At 228ish now with cal deficit and lots if cardio/maintenance lifting

File: 20170404_174935.jpg (906KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 2560x1440px

Im 6'4 228ish on a cut for about 1 month down from 240.

I honestly have no idea how i would look at 190. How much longer should I cut for. I posted previously wanna get down to 200.

>>40952828
>>40952893
the fact that you remember my arm width is flattering and worrying at the same time.
And im not talking 110kg thiccc. I'd be happy with 95kg, i just dont want to look like a twink. Its not the definition of thicc, but compared to what i looked like before, it would be thicc for me.

>>40952381
All the weight comes from your ass, bro

N-No homo of course :3