I got a body fat test and got 7.2%. This confused me, because

I don't even eat particularly healthy. I just try to not eat unhealthy.

>>40944609
What did you test it with because this always seems to be the secret answer.

If you did it with that stupid magnetic handle thing, its wrong.

If you did it with calipers then your brain is fucking bad.

If a doctor floated your retarded navajo ass then its legit.

Anything else is horseshit.

>>40944625
Okay, that explains it. It was with the retarded magnetic handles. Still, the person said that was the lowest they'd seen in years.
Are they just unreliable or something?

>>40944652
Was it a personal trainer that said that? Because those exist specifically to sell training sessions to retards and make them feel better about being a failure.

Post a picture. I can estimate your bodyfat.

I used one of those magnetic handles and it couldn't read my body fat because it was supposedly too low.

They don't work and they generally underestimate really hard

File: IMG_20170403_224018.jpg (528KB, 1920x1152px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 1920x1152px

>>40944695
No, it was some person set up at a stand advertising about fitness.

Yea, I haven't hit the gym in years. A typically days worth of food looks like no breakfast, small salad with chicken for lunch, and a glass of soylent for dinner.

>>40944800
That's not 7%.

Not bad, but not 7%

>>40944800
I'd say 14% or so. The stomach is a bit big, but I'm comfortable between 13 and 15%

>>40944800
15%

His 6 pack looks so fake and goofy
I don't know how you could choose a model out of anything anon

And the moral of the story is if it's not a dexa scan it ain't worth shit.

>>40945993
>not doing a full body mri and integrating to find mass