Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1489576186086.jpg (184KB, 1080x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
184KB, 1080x1080px
/fit/ tell me which is better for combining major muscle group whit secondary one for training session.
Chest+triceps
Back+biceps
or
Chest+biceps
Back+triceps
The arguments are that in the first case you train the arm muscle that is already pumped in the major muscle group training. The argument for the second one is to do full arm workout by training passively the one muscle group and actively the other one.
>>
Tbqh I do chest + back
And arms
>>
>>40783840
F U L L B O D Y
U
L
L
B
O
D
Y
>>
>>40784082
Fullbody is a meme
>>
>>40783840
Bump curious too
>>
>>40784096
Full body is a meme is a meme
>>
>>40783840
Back and biceps
And chest and triceps obviously
When your train back (pullups, rows etc.) you're automatically training your biceps and you might as well hit them even harder with a few isolations at the end of a workout.
Same goes for triceps and chest.
>>
>>40784106
I'm a testament to that meme
>425DL
>355SQ
>235BP
>155OHP
I still look DYEL as fuck (5'8, 167lbs)
>>
>>40784130
Those 1rm or working sets like a good boy?
>>
>>40784243
1rm
Working sets usually 90% of my 1rm
>>
First one. I found I can have full intensity every day doing PPL, even with DOMS.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1