Anyone good with physics here? Pic related. I'm trying

>>40674080
Just wattage from movement does not count for all calories burnt.

If you try a bike, pedal 100 watts for 30 mins, it will tell you you burnt more calories than just Power over Time

>>40674080
The calculation is ok, those are the you would burn IF YOUR BODY WERE 100% EFFICIENT AND MECHANICAL INSTEAD OF ORGANICAL.

But your body is neither.

>>40674080
a big thing about lifting is that your body doesnt just burn calories while it's working, like LISS cardio type stuff does, it continues to burn calories after you've completed your workout. This is why it's difficult to estimate and honestly, not worth your time

>>40674080
Your arms also have mass.
You tense in other muscles when moving weight too.
Your heart rate rises.
Your muscles being repaired burns calories.
I'm sure I could think of other things

you also use energy for recovery of your workout (afterburn effect)

>>40674135
>>40674149
>>40674125

So with every calorie burning factor included, this 12 kcal sums up to 200-300 kcal?

>>40674177
It simply means that your body uses more than 12 kcal to perform something that a 100% efficient device would with 12 kcal.

Just put ur workout in progression app it will give u estimated cals burned

I get about 400 to 500 cals burned per workout, but I think its closer to about 350

>>40674117
>is condescending
>organical

>>40676419
>condescending
learn to point out condescension you illiterate faggot