If you can't get the FFMI of 25 naturally, then you're either doing things wrong or you don't have the genetics.
Is there something that you people just don't understand?
This is the natty maximum if you're ever gonna make it.
http://www.naturalphysiques.com/28/fat-free-mass-index-ffmi
>>40604074
No, this:
https://www.thecalculator.co/health/Fat-Free-Mass-Index-(FFMI)-Calculator-794.html
>20.2
This calculator is bullshit
>>40604289
Use this: >>40604202
>6'4"
>Need to be 230lbs @12% body fat
lmao
'no'
>>40604357
Aim higher, cunt
>>40604202
>24.65
I doubt this is correct
>>40604731
Why?
26.91 feels good man
reminder
the higher your bf% is and shorter you are the more skewed result you're getting
a chubby 5'5 manlet will get very skewed results
>>40605477
That's exactly the point of this index. It takes into accunt bf%, height and weight, so the results are not skewed.
>>40605498
>>40605498
pls tell me why theres so many fat as fuck natties with 30 ffmi, it's skewed
Ranging from 24.33 to 22.56
Not bad feels about right
>>40604074
>>40604202
>Be 5'8 150lb roughly
>Anywhere between 10-18% called for an ffmi of 18-19 which is average
>Have to be made of sub 5% bf at thia weight to be "above average"
Wow how much would you even have to work to get tl even 5% bf
Fuck all that
>>40605511
Wtf are you talking about?
>>40605511
The part where people are going to fuck it up is by not posting an accurate body fat percentage