Is it true that i only need about 10-20 grams of protein after

>>40333357
Your anabolic window is more or less an invented marketing term used to sell you protein. Studies show that an individual who eats adequate protein through their normal diet gains almost nothing from post workout meals/supplements.

>>40333405
Really? That sounds crazy. Any links to back it up?

>>40333405
>>40333428
I moved to just taking a protein shake before my workout and just eat something fairly quickly after. That way I'm sure I get enough protein but I'm not too full to work out.

>>40333428
>common sense sounds crazy
do you think your body just instantly processes protein?

>>40334977
Isn't the science behind it that your body spikes in muscle repair and blood flow, and whey, as a fast acting protein, can be provided to the body quickly to use it as a resource to repair the muscle, ultimately making the repair (+expanding) more effective?

>>40334988
What science? From whey sellers? What evolutionary reason would this happen? Can you explain why this makes any sense at all without sourcing broscience?

>>40333405
Anabolic window after working out is bs, true. But studies show that protein before bed gets good results.

http://ergo-log.com/strength-training-evening-protein-shake-before-bed.html

>>40335090
This is the only thing that makes sense and, surprise, it's common sense. Our muscles don't repair when we're awake. They repair when we sleep.

>>40335020
>without sourcing broscience
If it's just "broscience" why does just about ever nutritionist, body builder, and athlete use and recommend whey?

It's not like I said "dude you take whey and it magically makes your muscles bigger", I gave an actual reason. Thanks for proving you want to be contrarian for the sole purpose of being different and thinking you're intelligent for being contrarian.

>>40335155
I'm not that other anon but you are so clueless m8- you completely changed your argument too.
Stay safe :)

>>40335155
okay bro go ahead and activate those muscles!

>>40335257
>completely changed your argument when there wasn't one to begin with
If you say so

>>40335614
You're retarded
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577439/