Some websites tell me that 100g of chicken breast have 32g of

>>40232132
It's actually 37g of protein per 100g of chicken breast.

>>40232143
Don't listen to this retarded cuckold. It's 36.5

>>40232151
Maybe, if you're buying low quality chicken. You have to buy the activated kind for the extra protein, retard.

Jesus christ for once dont shitpost and say something useful

Different chicken manufacturers have different amounts of water in the breast.

And frozen breasts are pumped up with saline. So of course you get fewer g's of protons per ounce.

If you dehydrate your chicken breasts like I do and put them in your shakes, you will know precisely how much grams you're getting.

>>40232132

depends if it's cooked or not you retard.

raw chicken breast is about 100ish calories and 24g protein per 100 grams.

>amerilards
>measures food by "servings" and not "grams/ml"

jesus fucking christ.

>>40232132
its 22g raw 28-32 ish cooked

>>40232205

So like what? Cooked has more or less proteins?

>>40232161
make sure you don't round your lower back when you deadlift

>>40232227
Depends if it is activated or not.

>>40232222

Nice numbers but why cooking would add proteins? I just dont understand

>>40232227
it depends on the water weight

>>40232132
Just assume that it has the lowest you've seen stated by a credible source. That way you'll always achieve your minimum requirement.

>>40232238

Activated? Are you shitting me? How do I know if it is or not?

File: IMG_1034.jpg (78KB, 360x300px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 360x300px

>>40232195
What the fuck?

>>40232242
Ir removes water.

>>40232242
its the water weight when you cook something the water is cooked out of it and thus weights less cooked than raw so 100g raw chicken = 22g protein but the same piece of cooked chicken weighs 85g and has 22g of protein

>>40232227

no dumbass, a piece of chicken when cooked becomes LIGHTER than when it was raw.

Hence why 100g of raw chicken has less proteins and calories than 100g of cooked chicken.

Man I bet beef doesnt have this kind of shit

>>40232242
cooking gets rid of any and all liquid inside of the chicken, so obviously 4oz of raw chicken is like 3oz once its cooked and ready to eat.

god im a faggot for replying

>>40232258
Just like you would any other food, like almonds for example.
Soak the chicken in water for 12 hours and the dehydrate it at low temperatures (40 degrees is good) for another 24 hours.

File: 1178149743289.jpg (22KB, 192x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 192x250px

>>40232195
>If you dehydrate your chicken breasts like I do and put them in your shakes

Okay anon

Are you seriously retarded? Fun fact, white meat consumption actually causes more cancer than red meat.

Go Vegan

>>40232331

Leave. Walk away from the room.

>>40232195
If you're going through the trouble of dehydration, wouldn't chicken jerky be the best option?

>>40232156
He can just activate himself doe.
Just lay it in room temperature water for about 2 days to revitalize it and start he activation process

>>40232364
No. The amount you'd have to chew to get what you can get on a single chocolate shake is prohibitive. Plus, jerky without carbs (from marinade) is pretty gross.

>>40232132
>2017
>he still consumes the avian jew
ishygddt

File: 1471568788431.jpg (298KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 720x960px

>>40232195
The Chicken-Shake, a classic in Alabama

File: 154856525823.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

>this thread

>>40232195
How do you dehydrate them? You have a recipe/technique you follow?

>>40232236
Top kek