How alpha are you, /fit/?
Physique:
>Obese: -10
>chubby/overweight with high bf%: -5
>holocaust mode: -5
>skinnyfat/skinny/average: 0
>skinnyripped +5
>swole/built: +5
>patrick bateman mode: +10
Education:
>Bachelors/masters in hard science, economics, finance, law or medicine: +10
>Ph.D: 0
>Bachelors/masters in soft science, engineering or others: 0
>Joke degree: -5
>Uneducated: -10
Race:
>White: +10
>Nonwhite: -10
Career:
>good finance jobs like investment banking, trading, private equity, hedge fund etc.: +10
>C.E.O + 10
>Lawyer + 10
>Other finance jobs like accounting, actuary etc. +5
>engineering +5
>generic office/clerical work: 0
>scientist/academia: 0
>other white collar: 0
>decent blue collar work (self employer plumber, electrician etc.): 0
>lower tier blue collar work (builder, thrash man, labourer, pizza man etc.: -5)
>unemployed: 0
Sexual partners:
> 5+: +10
>1-5: +5
>0: -10
>>40030495
40+: Alpha
25-40: Alpha-
-25-25: Beta
<-25: Omega
>>40030495
>Education:
So no perk for having a masters? thats bad
>Career:
Implying CEO is as good as common accountant/actuary
Also not including self employed with a good income
>Sexual partners:
Only counts if they were decent looking and sober
having sex with ugly chicks is sex but shouldnt add alpha points
also, no social category or summary of points?
Overall ill give it a C-, you put in some work but fell short of a better grade
>>40030548
Fair point on the latter two points, however a masters isn't more alpha than a good solid bachelors. In fact getting your bachelors and going straight into the working world with a good job is more alpha.
i got 25
>>40030495
Physique:
>Built
Education
>Bachelors in History...
Career
>Management Consultant
Sexual Partners:
>4
...
>>40030733
Race:
>White
>>40030495
25 exactly. Am I a beta or Lesser Alpha? Your poorly specified scale doesn't let me know which it is.
>>40030495
Pathetic
>skinnyripped +5
>Bachelors/masters in soft science, engineering or others: 0
>White: +10
>engineering +5
>0: -10