Help me out 5'10.5 20 years old as of now 145 ish 2015,

>>39948055
>Help me out

With what? wtf

>>39948133
Should be self explanatory

File: 1459943794580.png (74KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 300x300px

>I've been going to the gym for 2 years + with very small progress.

Aside from your leg, which looks improved.

Either you just recently started to eat properly, or you're having other issues.

>>39948173
Pretty much. Thought the last year I've been pretty consistent with the diet.

>>39948216
It's good that you began to take it seriously.
Took me 8 months to get my bench to 60 because I ate so little and underestimated what diet means to growth.

>>39948262
60kg, to avoid missunderstanding

File: 1483051033178.jpg (20KB, 412x352px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 412x352px

>>39948055
>gets a tattoo
>wonders why body is showing minimal muscle growth
the sticky is there for a reason

>>39948280
ah I was gonna say lol. What kind of progress have you made?

You need to have less bullshit and more heavy lifting in your routine. Focus on heavy compounds and eat more.

What are your lifts?

>>39949954
Deads I just hit 285 for 1 after 2 sets of 10 and 8. My bench is 185 after 2 sets, my (sitting) OHP is 115 for 3 and squat was 245 for 1 after 3 sets I believe

so you squat 1x a week but deadlift 4x... are you retarded?

>>39948055
post your starting numbers and as of now. it seems the usual case of not trying to progress every workout

workout should never be easy

>>39949954
and this. you have too much shit in your routine. there is a reason why most programs are simple af. there is no point in doing 3 different exercises that hit the same muscles.

find a proper routine and remember that more is not always better

>>39950463
I just started this routine today. Before I did everything once a week

>>39950523
I was doijg 5x5 for a little and want finding myself in the gym for a whoping 30 ninutes... fealt so under trained desu. is that normal?

>>39948055
As many have pointed out, your routine is too complex and full of random accessory work. Choose the meat of your workout then choose sides that complement it. I like that you have cleans in there, maybe do full cleans w/ front squat rather than so much diddly. Also do more rows, less bench.

>>39951201
5x5 is meant for the relatively time conscious... But you can add whatever accessory work on top of it if you feel that you're underworked. Do you have a goal? Just trying to get big or are you getting into a sport?

>>39951201

If you can get in and out on a normal 5x5 routine in 30 minutes... you're going extremely light or you have an absurd amount of conditioning relative to your strength.

>>39951317
I would like to hit 1/2/3/4 to start. my previous routines I would do 5 variants of bench 3x10 and the other half 4x8. This same forumula applied for legs, back, shoulders and arms

>>39951343
Well the 5x5's I was looking at there was like 4-5 total exercises. I did not know how long the rest periods should of been

>>39951373

For a lot of people, a max effort 5x5 would take longer than half an hour just to get through the first exercise. Now most sessions won't be that aggressive but 15-20m per exercise isn't unusual. Getting through 25 sets in less than half an hour isn't really practical for heavy lifting.

>>39951373

After two years you still dont know shit, yout stats suck and your body sucks. Time to use an actual program, with actual PROGRAMMING.

>>39951411
So long rest periods or just slow reps?

>>39951475
3. That's why I'm here. I'm assuming you'd suggest 5x5?

>>39951494

Long rest periods. Because heavy 5s are fucking exhausting.

When you're working with near-max weights, deliberately slowing down your reps is a really bad idea.

>>39951507

5x5 isnt a program. Use the texas method template, read practical programming.