>>39858623
This is shamefully ugly - quads are way too big + zero traps.
>>39858649
He LITERALLY did SS+GOMAD for a year.
>>39858623
Looks like perfect body for rugby. As for aesthetics yeah....
>>39858726
Implying pro rugby players aren't on roids
>>39858802
There's at least one person on my 17 years old brothers rugby team who is on roids lmao
>>39858623
post your own pic so we can compare
>>39858623
nobody ever says this
He looks good, just a little chubby (but he can cut that off) and unproportioned. If you wanna post strength meme bodies then link that candito pic, not this.
>>39858623
>looks better than 90% of fit
>actually looks like he lifts things up and puts them down
What seems to be the problem OP?
>>39858665
Double GOMAD. Srs
>>39858991
>unproportioned
>non-existant arms
>no traps
>no lats
>virtually no shoulders
>massive quads
>female hips
>>39859026
He looks borderline DYEL. If he puts on clothes you will never know he lifts.
>Retards complaining that building a strength base didn't make them aesthetic
No one said it would, you fuckwit. You're supposed to focus on hypertrophy now that you have a strength base. Then you'll see the gains.
>>39858623
still looks better than 90% of population
he could use some trap work and lean out
>>39858623
ungrateful cuck. you have a great base to build up upon now. whats your point?
>>39859135
I doubt that's the guy who originally posted the picture though. I remember seeing this picture in a thread that was posted yesterday >>39851749
you mean strength routines primarily make you strong and as a side effect give you aesthetics, and aesthetic routines make you aesthetic primarily and as a side effect give you strength?
wow profound
do routines suited to your goals
the differences between hypertrophy and strength routines exist for a reason