>Manlet (5'11) >Klinefelter's syndrom >Married

>>39703817

the fuck is wrong with his left ankle

>>39703817
>5'4
>intersex
>poor

I'm not going to make it

>>39703817

He's only the most famous because his tomb was found undisturbed. He was by all accounts a very unremarkable Pharaoh.

>>39703920
club foot

>>39704057

you're by all account a very unremarkable person.

ruling over your mom's basement doesn't count

>>39704057
This.

All the other tombs in the valley of the kings were robbed by ancient Greeks and Romans thousands of years ago. Tuts grave was robbed in the 1900s by the British. That is the only reason why tut is relevant today.

>>39704032
wtf is intersex can you please define this shit for me

>>39704032
going full trap mode?

if he had klinefelters he wouldnt even be fertile bruh how did he have kids

>>39703817
>implying tutankhamun is more famous than Ramses II

>>39705056
He didn't. He died a child.

>>39703920
King Tut was a product of incest.

>>39703817
Hes only famous because we found his tomb intact. Grave robbers got to all the better pharoahs first so we didnt find many artifacts from them. The only reason anyone cares about him today is because he was so lame grave robbers didnt bother taking his shit

>>39703817
>5'11
>klinefelter

lost height lottery even when most of klinefelter's are lanklets

>>39705119
b-but king tut was a homie. he wuz blak and we wuz kangz.

>>39705416
What do you think the average height was in Egypt 1300 BC?

>>39704090
>even the foot of the ancient guy with klinefelter's syndrom was clubbing and you sit in your parents basement

>>39705074
No he never. he had 2 stillborn children with his half-sister

>>39705475
Speak for yourself you fucking loser

>>39703817
>Manlet (5'11)

That was tall for those times though. The average human male was about 5'6 back then.

>>39705597
>3300BC

Probably like 5'0"

File: 1396203848703.png (80KB, 375x383px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 375x383px

>>39705498

>>39705615
Nah,

>Cro-Magnons were anatomically modern, straight limbed and tall compared to the contemporaneous Neanderthals. They are thought to have been 166 to 171 centimeters (about 5' 5" to 5' 7") tall.

So the Egyptians would have been the same. The only reason modern humans are taller is because we're have easy access to food, especiall meat and dairy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6S158_5vLc

>>39705597
lol, the Vikings were only 5'7" and that was just a thousand years ago.

>>39705678
The vikings were tall back then compared to the western and southern europeans.

>>39705660
Cro-Magnons were pre-Neolithic...

>>39705695
I think he's trying to say that since the cro-magnons were very early humans from which we descend from, its very unlikely the average human height would have been shorter than 5'5"