Am I missing out on too much by never directly working out my

>>39679994
first thing I notice on this picture was your chicken legs and that was before I even read your post

so yeah, you are missing out

>>39679994
THANK YOU CURLBRO

>no one cares about leg aesthetics

>>39679994
If all you do for upper body is chinups and pushups, sure, "playing sports" is enough for your legs.
If however you seriously train your upper body in the gym, it's not enough and you should train your legs to the same extent as you train the rest of your body.

Are front squats enough for legs or do i need low bar?

File: frontsquatskillsgains.jpg (58KB, 293x569px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 293x569px

>>39679994
Yes. Fucking clearly.
>>39680354
No Front Squats are inherently not good for leg development

>>39680394
I suppose this is sarcasm?

>>39680399
Yes, front squats are good for leg development.
Yes that was sarcasm.

OP does need to do some leg work though - front squats would be a good idea. It will work his back/abs too which is never a bad thing. Look up Max Aita when he's with Mark Bell for cues/understanding how to use your fucking legs in a squat.

No legs. No shoulders. No chest it seems.

Every day is biceps day.