If the general populace lifts with poor or incorrect form then

Low weights.

>>39614580
this. most people don't push themselves hard.

File: 1477270393444.png (34KB, 657x657px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 657x657px

>>39614580
>>39614590
so in other words the studies used to support the low injury rate conclusion are useless bullshit to us real lifters?

>>39614556
>Jones BH et. al.
>50-90% injury rate

youre retarded

>>39614641
>>39614604
well this is also a valid point that there are many injuries, they just are usually pretty minor because people will lay off them and not work out for a while.


but yes, any study you've seen that reports really low injury rates is bullshit for someone testing their 1rm then working at 75%-90% of it for 3x5, 5x5, etc.

File: 1401392760446.jpg (96KB, 396x388px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 396x388px

>>39614662
you could also get weakened/tweaked by lifting and not know it then "get injured" by doing something trivial like picking up a box or playing a aport

>>39614810
>aport
sport

most injuries are from athletes, who are straining their tendons, muscles and joints more frequently anyway

>>39614821
probably from lifting weights first.

lifting is only useful for post injury recovery

>>39614942
nah it's definitely from the actual sports.. # of games the average athlete plays has gone up a lot and more are specializing in one sport early on(leading to overuse injury) lifting is very useful for training between seasons and maintaining in-season

>>39614960
yet there's no proof of anything you said

>>39614604
>us lifters

File: 1310671390981.jpg (5KB, 251x240px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 251x240px

>>39615123
>he's not me