Been lifting 4 days a week. Heavy as I can been eating whatever

>>39611184
Why do you think, junior?

>>39611208
Dunno heard everyone say loft heavy wat big get big obviously within reason

>>39611221
this is the new motto of /fit/:

"Wat big, get big."

>>39611184
too fat

>>39611235
Me or her

>>39611242
> implying my gender
Triggered

>>39611252
Cuck

>>39611184
Who dis

>>39611184

https://youtu.be/3Gbx0pT1MX0

I want to sniff the sweaty farts out of her ass

>>39611308
Faggot

>>39611184
Big weight, low reps = fat
Low weight, high reps = skinny

It's basic physics. You move 10 kg for 100 reps at a faster speed = hugely more calories burned (work done) than lifting 100 kg fro 10 reps at slower speed.

Again, basic physics proves that "high reps for toning xD" is correct.

>>39611428
Ya I've been doing heavy as I can fit 5-6 reps a set

>>39611234
lmao

'loft heavy wat big get big'

>>39611464
Yeah, then you got what you paid for.

>>39611744
All I read was that's the way to build muscle

>>39611184
>falling for the low-volume meme
Enjoy no gains.

>>39611464
You've been lifting for strength instead of size. Muscle definition is just muscles getting bigger and losing fat. If you want definition, then do more reps. The range you want is somewhere between 8 and 12 reps.

You could have found this out by googling "how many reps to get big".