Wouldn't 20-30 reps per set be better for fat loss than

>>39603339
reps =/ fat burn

by that logic walking for 1 hour would be better than 10 min sprinting

>>39603339
3-5 reps is for strength training
20-30 reps is indeed better suited to burning fat and building endurance

this is in the sticky if im not mistaken

>>39603339
>Wouldn't cardio be better for weight loss than weightlifting?

Really makes me think.

yes if you want to just purely burn calories. It's kind of pointless though when you could just do 8-12 + cardio and end up loooking much better in the end.

>>39603356
calorie-wise, it is.

>>39603369
depends, muscles up your tdee and allows you to eat more for the same amount of fat loss.
makes it a bit easier to lose fat

>>39603339
Oh god fuck off, I'm migrating to r/weightroom. Way less shitposting.
>inb4 don't let the door hit you on the way out
>inb4 see you tomorrow
>inb4 xd lol reddit is for fags

>>39603339
Splitters do 8-12 reps per set and do more sets

They go for volume exhaustion rather than intensity exhaustion. And the reason splitters look better than powerlifters is they tend to cut more often than powerlifters because they don't care about maintaining strength. Their rep range doesn't magically make them stay lean.

I'm actually surprised there are so many newfags right before new years. Usually this time of the year is slow.

>>39603339

At that point you're just doing cardio basically. You're not doing anything to grow muscles (or prevent loss of muscle, in the case of weight loss).