Is this possible? 43% bodyfat at 77kg at 174cm manlet height.

File: DSC_1827.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>39433519
Pic related

Post body

File: DSC_1829.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>39433569
I'm at work so this is the best I can get.

>>39433665
No fucking way you are 43% bodyfat. you look around 20% at most.

>>39433665

your bf% is 18.5 dumbass

>>39433665
I would put you around ~20% with low muscle mass.
The numbers from your machine didn't seem feasible, I was expecting you to be full land whale.

>>39433677
Skinny fat with beer belly even though I don't drink alcohol. So I assume the machine is borked.

File: _20161117_134520.jpg (2MB, 5726x1733px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5726x1733px

>>39433677
>>39433679
>>39433683
The readings

>>39433703
>Sees that machine calculates BMI
Yeah don't even bother

>>39433665
You can definitely make it.
Work hard, eat clean.
Remember to nourish your body anon, feed it good food, train it well, and it will give you good results

>>39433791
I'm cutting though. Went down from 83kg. Doing SL and cutting to skinny/ottermode before I consider bulking.

Thanks anon, we're all gonna make it.

>>39433845

>cutting before bulking

This is the correct course of action.

In 6 weeks I've gone from 5'11" 193 to 179 and I feel better, look better, and my self esteem has gone up, and I've even seen my quads grow larger over the last 6 weeks.

I've also made progress on all my lifts will cutting.

Don't listen to them anon, cut, cut, cut, then once you're nice and trim, lean bulk.

Good luck

>>39433703
impedance machines can be really far off. only true BF% measurement is displacement test

>>39433883
They can be, but they're generally close enough. However you're wrong- DEXA scans are the gold standard. Displacement is considered kinda sub-par at this time.

>>39433791
What if you do all of those things but it kills you anyway?

>>39433519
>bioelectric body composition analysis
Those are total crap. You want accurate, find a doctors office or sports medicine clinic with a DXA scan machine. Best bet is find a doctor that specializes in osteoporosis, he'll either have the machine or know where to send you.

>>39434178
This thing was just standing there at the supermarket and was free to use so I thought eh no harm trying. When I get lean enough I'll get a proper scan. Thanks!

>>39433863
That's a lot for 6 weeks. Comparatively I haven't been dropping much weight since I started lifting about 4 weeks ago but I notice growth in my quads and upper body, while people have been telling me I look slimmer so I guess it's a case of losing fats but gaining muscles so the scales doesn't really reflect that well.

Good luck to you too my good man.

File: OG2hHwW.jpg (42KB, 634x480px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 634x480px

>>39434146
We're all gonna die one day. What matters is what you do before you eventually die. If I die in the next hour, my only regrets would be my kids would have no father figure growing up, but at least the insurance will cover the rest of the mortgage and leave around $200k for them until they finish high school.

>>39433519
http://cdn.ruled.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/40percent.jpg

Link related is around 40% bf OP

>>39433665
23% maybe, at most (probably around 18-20%). You have virtually no muscle mass.
Honestly, I doubt you weigh 77kg. Looks more like ~65kg to me..