Serious question Why is every "public" page on social

>>39334740
>social media
You answered your own question. If you've got real game and aren't such an insecure nu-male, you won't worry for shit.

>>39334764
>browsing social media now and then is for nu-males

Guess what

>>39334764
FPBP

File: IMG-20161102-WA0032.jpg (113KB, 824x639px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 824x639px

>>39334787
I can't quite understand your reply, but what I mean is socmed is <generalization> full of insecure plebs who crave undeserved attention, have low self-esteem, and are constantly looking for someone to look up to because they lake authoritative figures IRL </generalization> so as it ends up, people worship false idols like Kylie, Joff, Cristiano, Neymar etc. (for the Cristiano/Neymar bit: not for their prowess in sports but simply because they are superficially much more superior than the regular joes)

Look at the lives of people who is tied to socmed screens and you'll see that these people can't amount to shit and are therefore not worth worrying about or concerning for their approval. It's all they fucking do, and beyond that, they have nothing, can't do nothing and know nothing.

Socmed is a blessing to me. Why? Because it weeds out the weak and worthless (people who are CHAINED to socmed; not all socmed users) for easier sorting.

Women are bitter as fuck.
They fester in their pools of bitterness, dragging as many other women in with them as possible, rather than just moving on with life and fixing whatever led them to be with a cheater in the first place.

Common women are pathetic

>>39334881
>women are bitter as fuck

This