What makes foreground girl's ass better than background

File: 1476143131542.jpg (329KB, 1600x1400px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1600x1400px

>>39322651
>the same size

>>39322651
the angle the camera is at.

>>39322651

Clothes

>>39322651
literally just the angle

>>39322651
The clothes their wearing. Front girls but looks more pronounced and aesthetic because her clothes are tight around her waist. You can't even see background girls butt to waist ratio because of baggy jacket. That's why girls usually tie their shirts with a pony tail to accentuate their rump.

>>39322651

One is wearing clothing that emphasizes the ratio of the waist to hips and buttocks. Also the shirt is tighter which draws attention to the contour and shape of the ass.

The second girl is wearing a baggy shirt which distorts her figure and hides her waist changing the way you perceive her body shape. She is also standing differently with poor posture which again takes away emphasis from the booty.

>>39322651
It's the way the pciture's taken.

>>39322651
I like background better OP different tastes guy

pelvic rotation and slightly flexing glutes

>>39322651
Tighter pants, her shirt fits her form to continue the curve to her lower back. If the other girl was dressed similar they'd be the same.

>>39322651
Front girl is skinny with a nice ass

Back girl is flabby with a flabby ass

File: BIG-47-rumeysa-gelgi-lt-div-id-quot-a.jpg (118KB, 600x774px)

118KB, 600x774px

>>39323007
>>39322660
>>39322663
>>39322695
>>39322754
>>39322925
How many of you are non-white/asian?

the closer girl has a thin waist, while you can't tell with the other girl. Also angle

/thread

>>39323063
I'm Mexican

File: 1471145362952.jpg (179KB, 819x935px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 819x935px

>>39322651
because you can see her waist