Is this really just a cut? He looks bigger in the right pic..

>>38953124

>How the fuck did he gain muscle while on a cut?

It's called not being natty

>>38953124
He also gained a hat, totally a sign of roids

>>38953124
How can one man be so unlucky, that hairline, those insertions, poor lui

> there are actually people this stupid on this website.

>>38953174
Explain yourself

>>38953207

i.e. if you think he actually gained significant muscle between those pictures your IQ is most definitely below 100.

probably closer to 50

>>38953214
Well he lost at least 10% bf and didn't lose a lb of muscle. His traps even look bigger

>>38953124
You're supposed to keep lifting and eating enough protein on a cut, retard.

>>38953268

angle/lighting/optical illusion of being more cut/tan

how new are you to this? first 6 months?

>>38953124
those fucking forearms man. does he just not work them or does he have awful genetics?

>>38953124
Lowering your body fat does more to make you look muscular than anything else. His muscles only look bigger on the right because he is leaner.

Eating extra calories to 'bulk' only raises body fat and will do nothing to help you achieve your goals.

>>38953406
its just the angle m8

File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (59KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1920x1080px

>>38953424
not true m9

>>38953406
>>38953438
His forearms do look tiny.

Hopping on gear doesn't change your routine, if you don't do accessories like traps,forearms and calves roids will only marginally increase them.

>>38954393
>accessories like traps,forearms and calves

I dont think you know what an accessory is.
Also your traps are not like your forearms or calves at all, you use your traps a lot in every lift that works your back
Also your calves are worked when you squat
Also your forearms are worked when you bench, row, deadlift

This guy must just be only doing isolation machine lifts or something, his physique is fucked

Do people really think LUI is not natty?

He is very dedicated and knows how to train, and he is still very small.

The guy has poor insertions, and is like 150lb his arms are sub 15" because of how lean he is.

>>38953124
The worst curl bro I've ever seen. Look at those triceps.

>>38953124
If he took that picture after a pump and he dieted down for a while...maybe.

But I know that youtuber. He knows a great deal about bodybuilding, he's probably on a fairly conservative amount of gear.

>>38953124
>How the fuck did he gain muscle while on a cut?
because he isn't retarded and doesn't fall for the, "can't gain muscle while cutting" fallacy.
also because being leaner makes your muscle insertions/attachments more accentuated

>>38954393
>accessory muscles
>He only trains compound muscles like quads, and biceps

>How the fuck did he gain muscle while on a cut?

Anabolics.

Simple as that.

>>38953148
The amount of muscle you lose on a cut is minimal
Why do people think cut = lose all gains?

Y'all are retarded perfectly natural 2-3 month cut + tan

>>38955453
Is this your 3rd year of lifting already, kiddo?

>>38953124
No, he obviously looks smaller in the right picture. Muscles are just more defined due to less fat covering them.

That's HGH for you

>>38953172

Which insertions are you saying look terrible?

>>38953332
>calls other people retarded
>is a retard

He's obviously on steroid you mong and has definitely put on size. Lighting doesn't give you rounder pecks and traps an inch higher up your neck.

>>38953124
Jesus no triceps.

Looks possible, you can see he lost a lot of fat. Also, being on a cut doesn't mean that you won't make muscle progress

>>38953124
>He fell for the bulking/cutting meme
Unless you are a bodybuilder you dont nees to bulk and cut. And if you were you woulding be asking stupid questions.

>>38955861

no but it creates the perception of having larger muscles you dense fuck.

holy shit just leave.

> muh he gained nearly 200 lbs of pure muscle between these 2 photos!!!!!!!

> how /fit/ ! ! ! ! ! ! !!

>>38953124
Those two pics could've been taken 15 minutes apart. I don't see what the big deal is.

Also possibly natty. He's close in the traps but not quite to natty limit.

>>38956463
>>Those two pics could've been taken 15 minutes apart.
this is what fatties actually believe

>>38953124

A small deficit cut won't make it impossible to gain muscle, it simply won't be the optimal choice for building them. Only by getting on a bigger deficit you actively halt muscle building, and with a big enough cut you'l actually lose them a bit.

For exact numbers, see a professional. And try to not take advice from anonymous people in an anonymous board as ultimate truth (this post is not an exception).

wtf LUI

>>38953124
Hat prisoner of peace.

PROPAAAAH

LOYYYAALLL

>>38956463
>>38956463

This is 5 hours, but you get the deal

(Furious Pete)

>>38956279

Stop being retarded anytime

File: gsegssgses.jpg (21KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x360px

>>38957768

Oops

>>38953158

Super underrated

>>38954393
>accessories like traps,forearms and calves

>>38953124
man this faggot still makes vids. his whole channel is just gossip about synthol and roid victims

File: 796[1].jpg (27KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 625x626px

>>38956657

>>38953124
>>38953438

Did this guy forget to hit triceps and forearms?

>>38953124
I had no idea the L U I looked like a chemo patient without a hat.

What the fuck.

>>38956242
>Unless you are a bodybuilder you dont nees to bulk and cut.

Bulking means eating more than you burn. How are you supposed to gain weight if you don't eat more calories than you burn?

>>38957776

Stop being new to fitness literally A N Y T I M E

File: 1461706462760.jpg (169KB, 500x392px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 500x392px

>>38953172
dude got good insertions, minus tris he needs to work those and rear delts more in general

>>38955861
No, he's clearly noticeably smaller on the right when you actually examine the photographs.

He is also angled further to the right of frame, which accentuates some musculature in addition to the natural effect of low body weight.