Rate my 3 day split. I want minimum muscle overlap. A: Quads,

>>38835692
> I want minimum overlap
> I want minimum results

>>38835703
Eh what?
If I train e.g. biceps and then train them indirectly again without giving it proper rest time, the muscle will get injured and halt growth for that time period.

^afaik

>>38835692
HIGHTEST
I
G
H
T
E
S
T

File: 1474690810745.png (423KB, 540x959px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 540x959px

>>38835725
This is what actual high test looks like.

>>38835724
Muscle recovery needs 48 hours. One time per week means you waste 5 days not growing, thus getting suboptimal results compared to a 2x frequency (upper-lower split for example) or 3x frequency (full body)

>>38835748
AxBxC

I put 72 hours between to ensure maximum recovery.

>>38835814
This split has a 1x frequency, therefore you have 7x24hours (a whole week) in between, not 72h.

72 hours would be something like ABCABCx repeat, but 6 times per week is pointless for 99% of people here and probably counter productive. ABxABx would be a quite better alternative (where A=upper body and B = legs). or you can do ABxABxx to work on a 7 day cycle, which is more convenient for most people and leaves you with a free weekend.

File: blargh.jpg (32KB, 553x442px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 553x442px

>>38835744

>>38835814

You doing roids? You wont grow that way unless you are. There is no need to give each muscle a whole week off.

>>38835692
>Chyna chase
>she's not a porn star

Am sad

>>38835744
You don't really know what high test means, do you?

>>38835876
>a whole week

I do:
AxBxCxAxBxC...

The same pattern, so it's always 3 days between.
Which is 1 day more than normal.

>>38835936
Found the "bisexual"

>>38836043
I always leave 3 days between, it's quite decent methinks, it's one more than usual.

>>38836104
The /fit/ usage is misleading.
Sure, you refer to high test MALES but the phrasing sounds like it's referring to the female, which I believe many confuse.

Females with low test and high estrogen exhibit feminine features, such as body fat concentration being in periphery, thighs and chest and bit more in the face.

A high test female would have the same fat distribution pattern as a male, which is low on face (hence the 'rough' face of men') flat chest (instead of gyno), normal ass (instead of nigass)

Sure there isn't a 1:1 correlation, having high x hormone isn't reliably going to produce y features because the biology is quite complex behind it, there are other factors as well but test and estro are the big factors.

>>38836199
>The /fit/ usage is misleading.
The /fit/ usage is "Women who cause high test in men" not "Women with high levels of test"
There is a huge diffrence mate

>>38836213
I did explain that I understand the usage.
Just saying for me, it feels wrong.

Imagine in a post apocalyptic world, after many generations people would use the word "phone" to mean "leg"
There's nothing wrong with that on it's own, but it would feel wrong to you if I teleported you into that world, that's all.

Hence why I posted that low estro female/tranny, to be a cheeky cunt about it.

All this is very autistic.

>>38836199
>which I believe many confuse.
You belive wrong

>>38836213
>The /fit/ usage is "Women who cause high test in men"
No, more like "women to whom only high test males would be attracted"

>>38836248
>to be a cheeky cunt about it.
To be fair, if youre being a cunt you shouldnt call other people out on not being attracted to obviously unattractive women
Youre not wrong however, i believe if we tested that thing you posted it would have higher levels of test than an average female

>>38835692
Just do fullbody 3 days a week for fast gains.

>>38835692
Whats with all these fucking fat fucks lately? Has /fit/ become SJW or what?

>>38836398
>full body
Having 1 day rest in between?
How will muscles recover m8eighte

>>38836380
Is she too fat for you?
Or cartoony?

>>38835748
>>38835876
>>38836043

Are you fags?
It's the opposite.
If you don't roid you need more time to recover.

>>38835692
Yo id split that girl for three days if you nom sayin

>>38836782
>Is she too fat for you?
>Or cartoony?
Its the face, if not for the face i would have considered it

>>38837162
misunderstood.
i thought you were talking about OP pic

File: Shoryukeks.jpg (17KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x400px

>>38837133
>nom sayin
lost

>>38836199
AUTISSSSSST

>>38835692

I want to eat cheesecake off that ass