Have there been any scientific studies on frequency and hypertrophy?

Whenever there's a study on physical strength training the results are always the same:

"No significant difference was noted between high reps low weight and low reps high weight."

>>38746446
yo who is that ?

>>38746661
That's a load of horse shit

>>38746661
>>38747631
You're right, that IS a metric assload of total horse shit.

>>38746446
More volume = more mass.

So you are not doing enough volume to get enough mass.

>>38746661
Almost all studies I've read on hypertrophy has said this.

>>38746446
>pony tails
>lush lips
>thin body
>small tits

fucking perfect wife material (besides the fact shes posting images like this to other people, that's a huge red flag)

>>38747797
You're reading garbage because those two different routines will build two totally different physiques

>>38746446
low reps high weight = best gains

>>38746446

Yeah but most of them are done on untrained novices or 'experienced lifters' who bench 205 i.e. noob gains cloud any useful information they could have achieved from the study.

Lifting studies are, for the most part, complete trash.