Would he be aesthetic if he cut? For those of you who don't

lmao

>>38602919
he surely would, but he'd have to work hard on his legs and calves

>>38602924
also, OP. ignore this faggot

Most people who have any kind of muscle mass would be aesthetic if they cut.

>>38602919
He would be a nice otter probably. However in the time taken to gain all that weight, then lose it, he could have clean bulked and did it much faster and without having to cut for like 4 months.

Not to mention shit like
>stretch marks
>nutrient partitioning (whatever that is)

He is probably stronger than 90% of this board, even though he looks like shit.

Functional strength > aesthetics

>>38603055
No.

>>38602919
He would have nice looking arms. Nothing else.

>>38602919
did he die after ss + gomad? I never seen any pictures of his physique other than this. I guess he gave up after he ruined his aesthetics

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-12 at 6.39.13 AM.png (439KB, 480x790px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 480x790px

>>38603055
>Tfw you realize you can't drink tons of milk and squat your way out of this logic

File: Snapchat_1580186132936707070.jpg (125KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 540x960px

>>38602919
What did they mean by this

File: evetts_zach.jpg (50KB, 362x326px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 362x326px

>>38602919
Looks good in a shirt

>>38602919
HE GAINED 0.42 LB A DAY

>>38603055
Found the fatty

>>38603055
hahahahhaha, what functional strength u fucking mong?
when teh fuck r u gonna need to squat with 350 on your back? after a fucking anvil falls on you while walking on the sidewalk a la cartoon style?

>>38602919
>Would he be aesthetic if he cut?

What, his hair? That would definitely improve things.

>>38602919
Perfect looking functional body

>>38604244
>Looks good in a shirt

No he doesnt.

>>38604488

That is insane