>he can't do situps without injuring his lower back
>he thinks he can do deadlifts without injury
Are there any more examples of blatantly contradictory /fit/ logic?
>>38503378
Aren't dead/sit opposite movements?
>>38503378
>he thinks trunk flexion is safe and deadlifts aren't
Found the dyel
>>38503394
Not even particularly related.
Hip extension vs trunk flexion
>>38503394
>>38503394
>deadlifts totally made my low back invincible bruh
>goes into violent convulsions from 1 situp
>>38503378
nothing is safe guys! i can guarantee that if you've ever done even one sit up or one rep of deadlifts you are certainly going to die1
>>38503378
>>he can't do situps without injuring his lower back
Nobody here claims that. What is said is that crunches (not sit-ups) are pointless as an ab builder, and you may injure your T-spine
>implying they are similar movements
You are not supposed to bend your spine anyway during DLs
Shit bait, fuck off
>>38503394
>>38503444
>>38503573
>>38503580
>can't do a single situp without writhing in agony
Those deadlifts sure are working out for you ;)
100% of the people that do deadlifts die eventually
>>38503759
deadlifters BTFO
>deadlifts are a natural human movement but sitting up isn't
>>38503850
It isn't, though. No caveman ever wedged his feet beneath a log and lifted himself with his lower back without arm assistance for no reason. The natural way to stand up is to smoothly roll over onto all fours and stand up in a squat like manner
>nobody ever sits up without using their arms
>this is what meme victims actually believe
you can't make this shit up
a proper situp places less pounds of force on your spine than a proper deadlift. this is an objective fact. deadlifts are objectively harder on your spine than situps.
You mean to tell me you're afraid of performing a situp which places no more sheer forces on your spine at WORST but think deadlifting is perfectly safe which places as much sheer force on your spine at BEST ?
>injured my back 6 years ago in long jump
>still fucked up
Cool.