Is stronglifts / SS a meme? And can someone post that picture

File: 1469762020415.png (37KB, 700x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 700x600px

GreySkull is better. I'll post that circles thing after this.

>>38121724
>>38121734
Ive been lifiting for 8 months i went from benching 45lbs to 150lbs

still weak af

should I do greyskull?
will I lose fat and gain muscle at the same time?

>>38121724

How often should you progress? Is it to your discretion or every week?

>>38121899
It's right there at the bottom for you to read retard

>>38121910

yea, i saw it after i typed the question. thnks bby.

t. ADD

File: 1413974499655.png (27KB, 681x539px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 681x539px

>>38121734
>dips not marked on chest

>>38121937
Same poster you replied to. Is grey skull a good alternative to stronglifts do you think? I preferred the structure SL gave me tbhf

>>38121960
u did SL?

stats?

>>38121988
I ran it for a while back like a year ago and got to around 3 plate diddly and 2 on my squat, nearly got 2 on my bench also. I've found that I'm thinking 5x5 is kind of dead on me at this point, maybe doing stronglifts 3x5 with more accessories built in would help with progression too, but at this point I just need a routine.

>>38122008
why dont u stop powerlifting and train for hypertrophy now?

since u have ok stats lol

>>38122023
Hyper trophy training as a natty is a meme IMO. It should be done as an accessory to heavy movements

>>38122057
lifting for strength will give u that bulky muscly manly look

if u train for hypertrophy u get twink muscly look

>>38121724
why dumbbell curls?

what does it mean with OR chinups dont do the same muscles as barbell row!

>>38122071
>manly muscle
>twink muscle

Are you talking about muscle density vs muscle "toning"?

I would actually appreciate an example pic for reference

>>38122090
>>38121734
look at dis. dis mfer look strong af
>>38121717
now look at dis mfer he look twink. but he has muscle but he dont look stronk in a shirt he would probs look dyel

>>38122157
what are you talking about. both have same amount of muscles roughly. first one looks stronger but thats because of the lightning

>>38121734
Please note this body really is not that impressive.
No legs
Bis very lacking
Shoulders in dire need of lateral raises
Chest is very lacking

Nice core and leaness but thats about it.

>>38122174
fuck u bitch

people who train for strength look different than people who purely train for aesthetics

u get the point right

>>38122191
Give a better example faggot

File: 028ffde8333311e38a2722000a9f1925_7.jpg (95KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 612x612px

>>38122191
Lazar

muscle bro

dimitry klokov

strong bro

>>38122225
>those delts
>no roids
yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>>38122233
I COMPARED 2 ROID USERS TO EACH OTHER

ur bumhole isnt safe anymore

>>38121959
>lats not marked on pullups

Must do pure bicep pullups, might be too advanced for me

>>38121899

It's linear progression like SS