Why is there no "Big Back Lift" like there is for Bench

File: 1446584632166.jpg (79KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 720x540px

weighted pullups

File: 1468628891933.jpg (110KB, 718x628px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 718x628px

weighted chinups are the "big lift"
if you're not doing them you are seriously missing out on a big back

>>38089085
Holy scoliosis Batman

>>38089098
>>38089088
which one is better for back development?
chin or pull up?

>>38089112
Pull-ups

>>38089112
Whichever one you either enjoy more or find easier to progress and hammer volume with.

>>38089085
>but it hits your lower back and not you upper back

What the fuck?
deadlift hits your traps so fucking hard
maybe you should try more weight

File: 2016-01-12 18_05_12-Lamar Gant. 672 at 132 - Opera.png (3MB, 1200x879px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1200x879px

>>38089104
pic is real scoliosis
>>38089112
chin ups give your lats a better mechanical advantage, try to point your chest up to the ceiling when you do them.

If deadlifts only hit your lower back you're doing something very wrong.

But yeah rows are probably the best all round back exercise.
The reason barbell rows are not included in the big lifts is because form varies wildly from person to person and its just too hard to set a standard.

Also barbell rows are sub par compared to other row variants for training the back.
Just the barbell = superior fags can't accept this fact.

>>38089112
neutral grip is best, especially weighted
after that its pullups, then chinups (weighted chinups will fuck up your elbows, wrists and forearms)