What height is actual "manlet" status? No jokes, no

Fuck, forgot to put the poll in, here http://www.strawpoll.me/10790532

>>37986477
Anon's height minus 1 inch.

Less than 160 cm is manlet.
Less than 180 cm is normal.
Less than 200 cm is tall.
Less than 210 cm is giant fucker.
More than 210 cm is basket ball player worthy.

Fuck your units. I'm not voting, fuck off.

>>37986507
>cm

>>37986507
>less than 160cm is manlet

kindest categorization yet.

>>37986477
Anything below 6'4
>tfw 6'4 therefore not a manlet

File: giphy.gif (1MB, 400x298px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x298px

>>37986479

>Year of 2000 + 10 + 6
>Using units such as inches, feet, stones, pints, cups...

How does it feel to live in a third world country?

File: imperial_vs__metric.png (67KB, 1097x1029px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1097x1029px

>>37986605

Doing the averages, it seems 5 ' 8.75 is manlet, waiting for more votes tho.

>>37986605 implying everyone in the world doesnt use feet and inches to describe height. Literally the only thing people use the imperial system for

>>37986617
>arbitrary
>filthy peasants can't understand the superiority of base 12 counting system

File: 1408520068280.jpg (176KB, 926x875px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 926x875px

>>37986617

>>37986633 lol

>>37986477
As a 5'10"er In Metropolis Canada I feel about average, half the time I feel tall/tower the men and the other half I feel dwarfed.

Although purely anecdotal, statistics agree with me.

File: 1468953895447.png (440KB, 645x1260px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 645x1260px

>tfw 5'3

JUST

>>37986633
Always fucking gets me. Fucking based.

>>37986655 dont worry bro, height doesnt mean everything, at least you can get aesthetic af. Remember, It's not height that makes you un-attractive, its your low confidence from your height that makes you un-attractive

>>37986477
anything under 6' is manlet
if your height starts with a 5, you are a manlet

>only had one chance at life
>178cm
Just wish I could claim 1.8m

>>37986679
Absolutely correct - 183cm for europoors.

>>37986687
>178cm

Go get your leg bones broken.

>>37986695
My 'height' is already in my legs so it'd just look goofy and disproportionate, let alone painful.

I don't actually feel short tho, but maybe if the average for whites goes up then I will

>>37986625
Implying anyone outside USA and countryside UK uses feet and inches to describe height.

>>37986625
>implying everyone in the world doesnt use feet and inches to describe height.
Kill yourself

File: 054118f8630131518d2491dd486f5dd9.jpg (25KB, 400x296px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x296px

>>37986477
5'10-11" range is average, anyone who voted that as manlet status should realize it's where "men" are at

In order to have manlets and manmores, there needs to be a cusp. Thus, the average

>>37986705 In Australia thats all we use, never heard anyone say "I"m 182cm" and if they did they wouldn't even know what to compare that to.

>>37986728 lol bro its true, at least here in Australia

>>37986732
>>37986739
>btw guys, did I mention I am from Australia?

>>37986508
>2016
>being amerifat
you dont wanna make it, do you, you lil shit

>>37986507
less than 180 cm is manlet, seriously

yep, shortarses keep tryng to move the scale down. 5'11 is king of manlets, 6'0 is acceptable. and i say that as a lankster.

File: 1456456805061.jpg (11KB, 255x205px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 255x205px

i like to say 5ft11 for bants but really i think its 5ft10

>>37986477

6 F O O T
F
O
O
T

is the manlet cutoff

dubs confirms

>>37986477
Just meassured myself
177 CM
Though I was 176. But that was years ago
Almost 5´10

>>37986507
Less than 170cm is manlet

FTFY

>>37986507
Well I am 183 cm which is < 200 cm, so I guess I am a giant fucker :^)

>>37986732
He did mention countryside UK.

File: zYz43sS.jpg (480KB, 2400x1790px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 2400x1790px

Anything under 5'9 is short, anything over 6'3 is tall. Anything in between is average and 99% of girls can't tell the difference unless they're tall.

>>37986655
>extremely small man dying at incredibly fast speed

I am roughly 5'9, 19 years old and live in Sweden, just a 2 inch gain would be a humongous game changer. I have finished growing though. What shall I do?

>>37987394
KYS
Y
S

>>37987394
Move to a country with a lower height

File: 1460678606189.jpg (431KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 3264x2448px

>>37987247
>tfw 5'9"

>>37987394
Go back to the 3rd world shithole you came from ahmed

>>37987448
He's already in it Björn.

File: ddjG50Q.png (801KB, 965x685px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 965x685px

OP here, back from the gym boys, fuarkk yess. Did the averages and the new official manlet height is 5'8.3 or 173.5cm. It's now confirmed, let it finally rest. 5'8 is manlet status, I'll check again tomorrow but I don't think it'll get much more votes

>>37986605
>he has no idea what third world means
>laughingwhores.png

>>37987563
5'9" manlet detected.

>>37987813 lmao no lie, I am 5'9 so it really is true, anons height - 1 inch >>37986490

File: Flameonlittlecandledark.jpg (2MB, 4000x3570px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x3570px

>>37987446
>Not posting superior pic related

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

The two magic numbers are 6 in burgerland and 180 in yurostan

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle !

>>37987952
>implying i want to lose weight
gotta eat big to get big cmon 4 scoops, etc.

>>37987992
Cmon!

I fucking love that

Im 1,80 and i always consireded ppl 1,75 and under manlets.
Ofc I guess that would change to lower if i was 1,75 or higher if i was 1,85.

File: 1382469176809.gif (2MB, 245x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x225px

If you are below 6 foot tall, kys
If your dick is less than 7 inches, kys
If you're balding/receding, kys

File: 13770507_1100454683334696_6687867637654770709_n.jpg (82KB, 750x960px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 750x960px

>>37986507
>Less than 170 cm is manlet.

fixed, rest is perfect.

>less than 160: literally kys
>160-170: manlet
>170-185: normal
>185-210: tall
>more than 210: wew lad

>>37988145
That's pretty accurate

File: 1340714919548.jpg (11KB, 375x361px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 375x361px

>>37988017
mfw I am all these things...

File: 1439924422300.jpg (177KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 640x640px

Less than 180cm is the proper limit
t. tall european with

Merricans are fucked tho since they have feet and inches most people will think its below 6' even if they have lower average.

The other rule is that if you are below your regions average you are a manlet.

File: download.png (4KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 300x168px

>>37988076
>Tfw when I'm barely 5'7

194 cm reporting in :^)

>>37988017
>less than 7 inch dick

>>37986655

>Implying you're even tall enough to get your head through a noose

File: 1466036725464.jpg (53KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 474x595px

5'11 3/4, essentially 6'1 with hair and shoes. tfw when I'm a tall asian, white men bow down to me

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

6'0 and slept with at least 100 women. I'm perfect

>>37988017
>tfw 0/3
>still KV

at least i have potential r-right

>>37986655
Are you a virgin? Ever had a girl express interest in you?
I'm genuinely interested

>>37988251
>Are you me?

>>37987247

>6'2''

Should I start wearing flat shoes to get my hight down a bit?

>>37988604
This is why the whole height obsession on /fit/ is bullshit.

By /fit/'s definition, you should be swimming in pussy

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37986617
>eurotrash need to simplify their measuring system for their simple minds
TOP KEK

File: fuck this shit.gif (55KB, 498x264px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 498x264px

>>37988017

>5'-10"
>6.5" dick
>Widow's Peak

I'M CLOSE, DOES IT COUNT?

>>37988817
Are you me?

It's alright anon. 6.5" dick is above average and I have never had a girl complain.

>>37988604

If you have none of those it just means you are not handicapped but you still have to go get the girls. If you're a man things don't "just happen" unless you make them happen.

>>37986477
>http://www.strawpoll.me/10790532
>5'9'' is close
I put 5'9'', seems realistic. It's one inch shorter than the world average.

>5 "9
>7 inches
>great hair

I do okay, i was chatting with a friend the other day who is 6"2 and pretty aesthetic, we agreed that Pulling women in a nightclub is;

40% -Looks
20% -Confidence
20% -Fashion
10% -Hygiene
10% -Pure luck

I'd say around 5'6 is manlet height. It's hard to identify if someone is taller or shorter than me (5'9) unless they are 5'6 and below or 6 ft and above.

>>37988831

Sounds like a review for a Toyota Camry.

"It does what I need. Can't complain."

Meanwhile girls are lusting over Ferraris which do more for them than prevent complaining.

>>37988685
well to be fair i've been a shut-in neet for the past couple years so i didn't expect anything else

why do you guys put down people for something they cant change? it's not something you can improve with lifts.

I have a 7x5.5 dick, which is a little better than average. did I earn it? no. so why brag about it? sorry, but all you guys are doing is making people insecure for no reason.

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: image.jpg (39KB, 478x350px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 478x350px

>>37986605
>Not knowing the definition of "third world"
>thinking the Union of Eurabia is better than THE mother fucking FREE world
Enjoy your new Muslim overlords eurofag

>>37986633
Heh, gave me a good chuckle.
I'd say under 5'8" is manlet territory. 5'6" and under is 100% manlet though

>>37986477
I'm about 5'11" or so and I'm slightly above average at my gym. There are a bunch of guys way shorter than me, even some turbomanlets.

5'6" - below = Boy

5'8" - 5'7" = Short man

5'9" - 5'10" = Average man.

5'11" - 6'1" - MAN

6'2 - 6'4" Tall man

6'5" - up = Lanky

>>37989047
fat actually takes up some of your dick size
so yeah, you can change it

I'm between 176-177cm, isn't that 5'10?

I feel normal sized, bigger than most girls and guys(hey I live in a country that just recently has been putting out tall people, used to be all small)
near 180-184cm guys I don't look relatively small, they're bigger obviously but there isn't much difference especially if I'm wearing shoes that arent flat

File: 1468279588021.jpg (69KB, 640x468px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 640x468px

<5'10"--Manlet, disgusting, no future.
5'10"--Average man, acceptable, not manlet
5'11"-6'1"--Not tall but above average
6'2"-6'5"--Ideal height range
6'6"+--Not ideal in my country, possibly still in the good range for Netherlands and other taller countries

I say this as a 5'8" manlet myself.

>>37989405
are you me?
I'm [spoiler]br[/spoiler] and every fucking kid is already 185cm

>>37986507
South East Asian Oompa Loompa nigger detected.

Less than 1.75m is manlet (5'9)

>>37989460
I'm pt, hue.

I'm the second tallest person in my family, the first is my cousin which was 185cm at 13 years old, not exaggerating, he's estimated to reach 200cm but doc said he'll have problems in the future because of his height

I wonder if I wasn't a fatty and had a good diet as a kid I'd grow taller

>>37989506
I'm the second tallest in my nuclear family
My father is 184cm, which makes me kinda pissed off
If only I wasn't born in a caesarean section from a mother in her 30s

>>37986477
6'0 is the King the of Manlets and that's already pushing it.
>b-but the average height
Come on brah, who the fuck wants to be shorter than girls with heels?
>your girl decides to wear platform heels
>now you look up to her
I'd rather kill myself tbqh

>>37987247
>tfw 5'11
I knew that being royalty had its perks.

Full disclosure: I am a 5'8" manlet, but I will try not to be too generous to myself.

This probably varies geographically, but:

5'6" and below: You are a manlet. At risk for short/little guy comments and the like.

5'7"-5'8", maybe 5'9": You are danger zone. You are objectively a short or shorter dude, but people don't bring it up in conversation and barely think about it.

5'9"-5'11": You are a normal dude, height doesn't enter into the equation. You have none of the problems of the short or the tall.

6'0"-6'2" or 6'3": You're considered a tall dude. Chicks that say "I only date tall guys omg" are talking about you. You're in the sweet spot.

6'4"+: You are very tall. You may be approaching awkward territory depending on your build. Your bones are starting not to like you very much.

6'7" and beyond: Basketball or bust. You are defined by your height and your body is probably awkward as fuck for you to manage unless you have been and remain physically active.

>>37989522
Weird that you're my height with a father that tall

mine is 169cm and my mother is 150cm, grandfather no idea but he used to be 170cm pretty sure

>>37989554
I was sedentary as fuck so that's probably it

>>37986617

F is superior in medicine because it gives a much more accurate and precise range of temperatures to measure internal temp, with simple house-hold thermometers.

>>37989405
2.5 cm = 0.025 m = 0′0.98″
1.76 m = 5′9.29″
1.77 m = 5′9.69″
1.78 m = 5′10.08″
1.83 m = 6′0.05″

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>actual
See the thing is nobody irl gives a shit unless you're really tall, really short, or oddly proportioned. Your insecurities stem from elsewhere and are more of a turn off to women.

>>37986477
Average woman wants her man to be taller than her or they'll look weird.

Average woman in us is 5'4".

Guys must still be taller or same height when average girl wears heels or girls feel like they can't dress up without that original weirdness of being taller than him.

However when a girl wears heels, men don't have to be taller, they can be the same height because everyone can see the woman is artificially raising her height.

So lowest height a woman would date using these standards and being average height is 5'8".

5'7" and shorter .official Manlet height

>t. 5'4" female

File: WP_20160720_026.jpg (1MB, 1456x2592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1456x2592px

>>37987082
>tfw exactly 170cm

thanks for the existential crisis

>>37989365
Also growth hormones can have a small (and when I say small I mean small so don't start fucking injecting your dick with HGH) effect, somewhere in the 5-8%.

>>37989550
5'7'' here with shorter and tall as fuck friends, can confirm this

>>37987952
Flame on, Little Candle!

>tfw barely above 5'6

I can p-pretend like I'm 5'7, r-right guys?

>>37987952
>>
Flame on, little candle!

5'0-5'5" - manlet
5'6"-5'8" - short
5'8"-5-10" - normal
5'10"-6'1" - tall
6'2"-6'4" - lanklet
6'5"+ - freak

File: image.jpg (136KB, 644x1078px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 644x1078px

>>37986617

>>37990031
5'6 here too, I know that feel bro

>>37989579
t. American with no knowledge of medicine specifically regarding the use of both temperature measuring systems

>>37988771
>simplifying complicated things means you have low intelligence

>>37990069
here in norway 6' is average.

enjoy your beta genetics

>>37990182
>Norway

Enjoy living in the 3rd world

>>37986633
AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!

>>37990193
>'Muricans think the cold war is still relevant today

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

<170 cm = short
170-180 cm = normal
>180 cm = tall

>>37990193
you're thinking of sweden, kiddo

manlet is not how short we are on the outside. it is how short we are on the inside.

>>37986605
It feels like we're the only country that's been to the moon.

File: happyface dog.jpg (150KB, 852x1041px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 852x1041px

>>37986633

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37989522
Wait does a caesarean section make a difference in height? This is very concerning.

>>37986617
Name country from which men walked on the moon.

Name country that won two world wars.

Name undisputed heavy weight champ of military world.

Name unit system this country uses.

>>37990275
>Name country from which men walked on the moon.
USA
>Name country that won two world wars.
Britsh and allies
>Name undisputed heavy weight champ of military world.
China
>Name unit system this country uses.
Majority use metric

>>37986477
Dutch here
I'm 5'10 and I'm manlet.

File: 1453172917372.png (23KB, 503x430px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 503x430px

>>37990295
>China

I'm 5'7 so anything under 5'7 ;~)

>>37990316
Yea USA is the undisputed military heavy weight
But the US has to spread out their forces continuously. They've made so many enemies and have to intimidate others into staying friendly and cooperative.
They can't effectively project their force.

File: top-5-best-beatles-songs-sung-by-george-harrison0.jpg (91KB, 495x460px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 495x460px

>>37986633
top kek

>>37990351
Kek if we wanted to we would bomb every one of our enemies 5 times over. Its just not benefitial.

>>37990466
Because the rest of the world will turn on you

really depends on the country.
Average height minus 5-10 cm

>>37990466
Typical Dunning-Kruger kicking in when it's about US military. Every time. It's okay anon.
Underestimating your enemies and overestimating yourself is the recipe for defeat.

>>37986477
<1.73 manlet
1.73m-1.78m normal height
1.78m-x tall.

>>37990484
I wouldnt be surprised if Europoors joined with the Muslims to try to defeat America.
>>37990503
>overestimating sand people

>>37990585
>rest of the world are sand people

>>37990351
The yearly military expenditure of the US is higher than the entire rest of the world combined. No single country even approaches US military capabilities and even China+Russia+EU combined would be obliterated in a short war with the US. Their ports would be blocked within days, their cities reduced to ash by superior air power. The US could literally win a war against the entire world simultaneously.

No expert in foreign policy and global politics disputes this, none.

>>37990589
I meant that about enemies of the US. I guess you could include best Korea im there as well.

>>37990590
Delusion: the post.

I honestly can't detect a single bit of objectivity in any post coming from Americans regarding military.
It's always "WE BOMB EVERYTHING LOOK HOW MUCH SHIT WE HAVE". It's completely unrealistic.

>>37990621
You are right, it is unrealistic because we would never have to. The whole world fears us so we would mever have to bomb any single country to the ground.

>>37990618
You seem to forget that the rest of the world doesn't want """you""" to launch a nuke for the prosperity of mankind
Launching a nuke is asking the rest of the world to put down a tyant

>>37990651
Assuming we are launching nukes what they want us to do is irrelavant. We have enough nukes to bomb the whole world.
Im not even very patriotic its just funny how you Europoors will try to pretend we cant destroy anyone in the world. Its like the beta manlet in the friend group getting angry because he doesnt like how the alpha(USA) is getting to pick where they are eating yet he cant do anything about it.

>>37990642
>The whole world fears us
Nah, your crying anti-white racist president put an end to that shit.
US foreign policies have been extremely weak.

The US would have to commit a significant amount of forces to bomb a modern country, which the US has never done. They have never been seriously tested. Except your naval forces near the Syrian coast. And they ran.
What would happen when you move around assets in order to bomb one country? You leave vulnerabilities. Guess you don't play chess. And how effective is bombing?
The US has lost all wars the last decades.

>>37990699
It's funny how you can pretend to destroy anyone in the world without consequences.

>>37990703
>they have never been tested
Why do you think that is?

>>37990730
Because the US is not as superior as you think they are and mostly avoid direct confrontations.
Ergo, US vs Russian fleet near Syrian coast.
US wanted to go to war with Syria, Russia told you to fuck off and your war fleet fucked off.

>>37990703
Won, actually.

What america failed at was long term occupation and stability, which funnily enough is necessary when you shoot up a place. For the constraints and roe that mainstream american forces operate under, they've done an OK job. The real failings come from elsewhere, who underestimate what needs to be done to fully finish the job or perhaps never really planned to. Things like pacifying the middle east require radical social changes to be carried out across generations of military occupation, not less than a decade of war done under the scrutiny of a sometimes unsympathetic public and less than appropriately supportive government.

>>37990753
Obama might have chosen to pussy out. That has no effect on the power of the US military.

>>37988578
Dude I'm 5 11.5 barefeet
I've been doing stretches for the last inch. It's more worth than 10 lbs of muscle in my eyes

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37989257
This is pretty accurate. The problem is that tall men are more men than men.

>>37987952
Flame on, little Candle!

>>37990778
please. a handful of muj who shoot from the hip fought the us military and their 19th century french strategy and tactics to a standstill for a decade.

>>37990772
>Won, actually.
Lost, but you seem to have excuses for everything. In the end, you still lost.
But pretending a loss is a victory fits in with the general delusion on this subject.

Manlet is basically another classification of midget to me. I would say manlet is whatever the average height of women is in your area. If you are above that, but below the average male height than you are short. +-1 from average male height is average. Taller than 2 inches from male average means you are tall. Over 6 inches from male average means you're a freak.

Example: Male average = 5'10, Female = 5'4 (I believe these are the US averages)

Manlet: <= 5'4
Short: 5'5-5'9
Average: 5'9-5'11
Tall: 6'0-6'4
Lanky weirdo: >= 6'5

If you're at like 80.2in or 78.7in then round accordingly to the closest whole number.

> <190cm=manlet
> >200cm=lanklet

>>37987952
>http://www.strawpoll.me/10790532
Flame on, little candle

>>37986655
I got a friend who is just as tall as you, he's toned as fuck and has little to no problems getting girls.
I don't know if this is different in the US and A, but here in Europe shorter guys simply settle for shorter girls, it's the height relation that matters.
The girls don't like guys so tall that they can't see / reach shit.

>>37987952

Flame on, little candle!

File: 1468920989177.jpg (43KB, 344x344px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 344x344px

>>37988619
>Are you a virgin?
Yes, but I'm only 19, so not that bad. I'd imagine that my growth plates have closed by now

>interest
Yes. Even though I'm short and shitposting, I still have confidence in myself. Most likely from a Napoleon Complex

Several people have said I'm attractive and have nice facial aesthetics, and I take care of myself. However, it always borders on "You're so cute" as opposed to 'handsome.' One chick even said I'd be such a "babe" if I was a little taller.
I mainly fucked up any chance I had by acting needy or nice, but I've learned very quickly to not do that.

People always fucking compliment how I act too. I can't tell you how many times a girl said "You're the most chill person I've ever met, you're really cool," so I suppose that amounts to something

>>37989522
I was C-section and I'm 6'4", the tallest person in my extended family. The fuck does C-section have to do with it?

5'11.75" checking in.
>Anyone taller than me is a lanklet
>Anyone shorter than me is a manlet

>>37989999
chek'd

>>37989047
A lot of /fit/ doesn't even lift so they make fun of short guys to feel better about being lanklets and lardasses.

>>37987952
flame the fuck on little candle

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37990295
No one uses metric outside of STEM. I literally never hear it outside of that.

>>37990136
Fahrenheit is a better scale for human relatable temperatures. Celsius is a better scale for science and precision measurements.

>>37989550
5'7 can confirm l do jokes all the time though

File: LifeIsHorrible.jpg (139KB, 1024x942px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1024x942px

>>37986477

I thought the official status was anything 5'10" (177cm) and under?

File: tomcruisetinyhead.jpg (81KB, 419x480px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 419x480px

>>37986477


Taller than Tom Cruise: not a manlet.
Shorter than Tom Cruise: manlet.

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37986617
Day month year is retarded.

Sort these.

21/3/2016
12/1/2016
20/6/2016

vs.

1/12/2016
3/21/2016
6/20/2016

>>37988017
>6'0
>6.8 inch
>>>>widows peak

Fuark. Time to an hero

File: SHORT.png (448KB, 700x2177px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 700x2177px

>>37986477
When will we all learn?

>>37991436
Year month day master race for sorting

>>37986617
Year month day is the best you backwards freak

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

The average height of a Fortune 500 CEO is 6 ft so I'd say 6 ft tall is the minimum

>>37991436
Most often changed to least often changed or vice versa
The American random order makes no sense at all

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37991155
I can't remember the last time i heard or used an imperial unit at all anywhere
Imperial units are slowly dying out

>>37991170
Your right. 98.7F is a lot easier to remember than 37C
What ever system you use is easiest, but you can't deny that metric is far more logical

is this the daily ego boost thread?

congrats on your genetics, you people are acting like dan bilzerian who spends money that his dad left him.

did he earn it? nope.

169 is short
173 is still somewhat short
174-183 is normal
184 is tall
191+ is very tall

All in cm. Im Polish btw, may be different in the burgerland

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: 1465150568082.jpg (176KB, 386x468px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 386x468px

>>37986477
Anything under 5"10" is manlet mode. 5'10" ideal-height- master race here

>>37987952
golem get ye AWAKEN MY pupper

>>37986676
>Remember, It's not height that makes you un-attractive
actually it is lmao

t. 6'2 male that has overheard a lot of girls make fun of manlets

>>37986477
an inch shorter than me is hopeless manlet, an inch taller is disgusting freakazoid lanklet

5'9 and lower: absolute manlet
5'10 & 5'11: pushing it, hope you have a great face
6'0 & 6'1: you've escaped the clutches of height insecurity but beware that without a proper body/face it wont save you!
6'2 to 6'4: perfect height for anything. If not completly autistic, you win.
6'5 and more: depends on genetics

>>37987952
'Flame on, little candle!'

>>37991041
>People always fucking compliment how I act too. I can't tell you how many times a girl said "You're the most chill person I've ever met, you're really cool," so I suppose that amounts to something
They are only pitying you, women love to do that, like when they see the burn with acid face of someone and say "how beautiful it is". You are not going to date these womans

Also 21yo 6'3ft virgin

>>37986477
Wait, what?! People under 5 foot 9 actually think that they're not manlets? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Wrong, less than 182cm is manlet.

If you aren't 6' you are manlet.

Likewise, if you aren't 200lbs you are a child.

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37986477
>all the 5'8" and 5'9" manlets desperately voting 5'7"

File: 1467599841652.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

Why do Europeans complain about Americans being obnoxious but whenever someone uses a system they don't:

>Fucking amerifats kills urself lol third world country

I've literally never seen a thread burn down because someone posted metric, but the second imperial shows up you fuckers lose your minds. Yeah, Americans are the obnoxious ones.

>>37995296
>using imperial
Fucking plebs

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37986477
5'9 is the shortest you can be and still be not a manlet in my book. 6' here. 5' 8" and people will start to call you short

>>37988017
I just barely meet your arbitrary criteria. Thank god I dont have to kill myself.

>>37988251
congrats on hitting the cut off for one persons opinion on an anime board.

>>37995214
Can see why you're a virgin.

>>37987952
Came on, little flandle!

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37986633
Top kek

>>37986479
LOL all these manlets in denial
anything below 6 feet is manlet size

>>37987952
flame on little candle

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: haunter used mean look.jpg (7KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 320x180px

>>37986676
Yup, 5'7 and some how I get pussy. It's that lucky 7 brah

>>37986648
Well hey you live in Shanghai so you're definitely above average.

>>37986648
>>37996871
nah kids are growing, plus in Shanghai they're pretty tall. my height's in my legs so people assume I'm close to 6feet

>>37991041
Im 5'7 and as a cut off manlet its important to not lose your cool if someone calls you short or if you get angry. Theyll see a Napolean Complex right away. Best to remain chill and based.

>>37996923
First off Napoleon was not short so we should put that phrase to rest for fucks sake. Secondly you are a severe manlet and nowhere near the cut off.

>>37987952
flame on, little candle

>>37990753
Do you honestly think that's because we can't beat them?

File: ClassicOKAY-arino.jpg (48KB, 501x639px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 501x639px

>>37996935
pls be troll.

>Napoleon was not short
Napoleon was 5,7

>You are a severe manlet
Im 5'7

Breh.

>>37996992
He was actually average or above average for the time. I can't remember what his exact height was or what the average height of the time was, but I know that much. I remember it being entirely possible that Napoleon was actually taller than that.

You can't really use the heights of historical figures like this, especially when they're that old. You just look like an insecure retard. I wonder if you're the same one that posts about Napoleon's height on /pol/ too

not the guy you're replying to btw

Napoleon was 5'7

>>37987952
flame on, little candle

I'm 5'5

the female average height here is 5'1.5"

>>37997009
k

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37987952

flame on little candle, you are the only thing i have right now

>>37997009
I'm the guy he was replying to, but I couldn't have put it better myself.

>>37997059
well i should just go die then

female at 6'0

>>37988251
if it makes you feel better i still think youre a manlet

>>37997218
hahaha

tal girls are super slutty, too, because guys don't want to stay with giantesses.

I forget whether tall girls or fat girls are sluttier. I think it's tall girls though.

>>37997218

i'm a male though

>>37997218
Tall girls are top tier. I'm sure you have killer legs.

File: 1383711943194.gif (3MB, 474x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 474x400px

>>37987247

>tfw perfect size for a woman
>tfw would rather be a woman
>tfw will never be a women
>tf, tf...

>>37997273
Nah being a man is better, but I guess you'll never be a man either eh?

>>37988145
Normal people would wholeheartedly agree with this. Even make it below 175cm as short, 175-185 as normal, 185 and above as tall.

Manlet status.
A Manley is someone short, particularly shorter than girls.
When girls are in 6 inch heels there height is added by 6.
There for manlet status is anything less than a average girls night in heels.
A US sample showed a average female hight of 5'5".
Thus Manlet status is anything 5'11" and under

>>37998320
most assbackwards things ive read all day

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: aoutme.gif (266KB, 240x127px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 240x127px

>>37997552
>tfw 175.5cm tall

>>37986605
I'm 1.98 yards in height and 5.61 pudi in mass

>>37987952
flame on, little candle!

File: sabinaaaa.jpg (139KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 640x640px

>>37997218

pls be in Kazakhstan

>>37999493
yeah... kinda sucks being in this middleground

while people dont call me short, i dont get the benefits of being tall

>>37990275
that's also one of the fattes countries on earth, so fat = best? fucking ameritards i swear

>>37987952
flame on, little candle!

File: 1338369869972.jpg (213KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 600x800px

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

>>37987952
Flame on little candle

>>37987247
first non trolling infographic I've seen yet. and I agree with your 5'9" - 6'3" rule.

worth mentioning that bell curve is of the distribution of potential partners - not of height itself (for anyone just looking at a glance). Median height, (depends on the country) but for UK/US generally lies 5'9.5" - ish. FFS - wikipedia much?

Something I've always wanted to make clear to manlets/lanklets. You are allowed a MEDIUM category. If you are a couple inches below the EXACT average - you are not manlet, you are medium. If you are a couple inches above the EXACT average, you are not lanklet - you are medium. by exact average again I'm talking the 5'9" value - not "LOL anything below 6 foot manlet! when will they learn?"

if short applies as an adjective, it ought be used for the outliers (men below 5'7" I'd say) likewise, tall should be used for the 6"+ people. that big lump in the middle are MEDIUM height.

>>37989430
I'd agree if the height here applied the way dick size does - banging a few inches on top. I think these results are skewed slightly.

also, nothing ideal about 6'5" - that's borderline Gigantism.

>>37989550
can confirm - 5'9" and bona fide tang slayer. there It's extremely rare that a woman is taller than me (not accounting for heels). but yeah, these a lot that I would go after because they are too tall for my tastes. which is a shame - some of them are hot.

>>38000144
should clarify - they are too tall in heels. plus I like em dinky. think Danyres Targeryan.

below 170cm/5'7 is manlet. i feel like i'm on the border between tall and average (184cm/6ft) and think that's small, like, well below short even.
(5'7 perfect height for a woman though imo.)

that murky 5'9-ish region seems like it's fucking sink or swim territory though dude. depending on posture, build, clothes, surroundings, etc those guys can either come across looking acceptably average or remarkably small.

Flame on, little candle!

>>37989229
this. Im 5'9" and I still consider myself to be pretty short. That being said, a lot of my friends are about the same height as me and I am taller than 90% of the girls I meet. 5'9" may be short but I wouldn't consider myself to be a "manlet".

5'6"

>>37988771
>americlaps need to complicate something to have at least some mental strain in their lives.
Also
>Implying complicating something used for accuracy is beneficial for accuracy

>/fit/
>fat lanklets

https://youtu.be/6bZnqyE14RY?t=3m16s

>>38000361
what about a 178cm guy? like 5'10 and quarter, is that the true white male average

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: 34534534534.jpg (5KB, 240x210px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 240x210px

>>37986508
>implying only amerifats visit this place

>>37987952
Flame on, little candle!

File: manlet unanimous.png (68KB, 411x103px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 411x103px

This is Tom Cruise's actual height.

>>38003740
>tfw this is my old man's height

sorry bro

>>37997009
Average height of a Frenchman in his time was 5'0 " in French units, which would be 5'6" by our measurements.

>>37986617
There is no way for amerifats to defend this.