Anything wrong with having a 95-100% fruit diet if I take a multivitamin?

DIE A BEET US

>as long as I take a multivitamin I'll be OK

people actually believe this

Too much sugar, too little protein.
Also you'd need to eat a FUCKTON fruit.

Go ahead and do it

I'm sick of the influx of vegans and fruitarians

Do your shitty diet, I'll be lmaoing at your life when you're falling apart from nutrient deficiencies

>>37832282
>Don't really like the taste of vegetables, meat, eggs, dairy, grains, beans etc

nature wants you to die, just get it over with already

>insufficient protein
>insufficient fats
>diabetes and pancreatic problems from all the sugar
>too much volume in food to eat enough comfortably
>poor nutrient absorption from all the fiber
>insufficient micronutrient profile (no, multis won't fix this)

File: 0efa260340dac6fe.jpg (64KB, 640x380px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x380px

Hey, guys, can I subsist on a diet of nothing but walnuts? I don't really like the taste of fruits, veggies, meat, grains, or other nuts. My little brother has some chewy Flintstones vitamins, so I'll be fine, right?

>>37832298
It's perfectly healthy, especially for one who's active, bananas have plenty of protein.

>>37832499
>one gram per
>plenty
lmao

>>37832492
Kek

File: 1464638001173.jpg (19KB, 335x363px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 335x363px

>>37832499
You would need to eat 5 bananas to get the same amount of protein in one egg, you diabetic fuck.

>>37832308
>Do your shitty diet, I'll be lmaoing at your life when you're falling apart from nutrient deficiencies
does anyone actually believe this? I spent like 3 years of my life eating shit, like one meal a day and that meal was usually garbage

I'm still alive. I was doing very fine.

I eat better now because I lift, but deficiencies are a meme

>>37832282
worked great for Steve Jobs

>>37832518
So fucking what? Bananas are obviously healthier than eggs and they're cheap. Just because eggs are more delicious doesn't mean one shouldn't stuff their bellies with stacks of plants instead.

>>37832540
>Don't worry about my protein brah, I'll just eat over 50 bananas a day!
My sides

>>37832522
>All these medical studies are a meme because I spent 3 years eating "badly" and I'm fine!
The only meme here is you

>>37832573
m e m e r
e
m
e
r

File: e9d.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>37832540
>Bananas are obviously healthier than eggs

>>37832282
Reminder that your hippy bitch is full of shit and doesn't follow her diet at all and regularly eats like a normal person

>>37832282
Imagine being at the grocery store and some meme diet cunt clears out all of the bananas.

File: 1466592885984.png (218KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 490x490px

>>37832528
Kek

>>37832282
Nutrient wise you should be fine if you eat some nuts and seeds with the fruits. You will just be really hungry all the time with so low protein and complex carbs

>>37832282

Goddamn freelee is so fuckinh stupid. I bet her shits smell like banana smoothies and shit.

>>37832298
It's enough protein for someone with a svelte build. There is no whole food with less than 4% of calories as protein.

/fit/ is so fucking stupid.

>>37832282
Just find veggies that you like, there are lots of them around.
Veggies are healthier than fruits, so try to eat them more.

I saw this self righteous cunt tell a doctor of medicine on LIVE national television that "meat causes cancer" and the look on the Drs face was something like "I'm not gonna waste anymore time discussing this". Classic.

>>37832282

What do you plan on eating through the course of a day to get enough calories, protein, and micros with just fruit?

>>37833616
Two watermelons.

File: bait.gif (4MB, 648x265px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 648x265px

>>37832540
> Bananas are obviously healthier than eggs

File: FB_IMG_1466500377262.jpg (27KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 498x498px

>>37832282
>Don't really like the taste of vegetables, meat, eggs, dairy, grains, beans etc

You must be fun to be with.

>>37832540
I completely agree with you, the other anons are just are too stupid to actually go and look for some info on this

>>37833633

>avg watermelon yields ~15 lbs of edible watermelon
>serving approx. 0.5lbs
>OP will eat 60 servings of watermelon a day
>calories = 2,760
>sugars = 600 g
>protein = 60 g
>calcium = 60%

on the bright side you get 1000% of your vitamins A and C

>>37832540
>24 bananas to hit 2500 calories
>31 grams of protein
>a week's worth of bananas is ~170 bananas
Please tell me you're kidding

Nothing wrong with that.

I get at least 60% of my calories from fruit.

Search Free Natural Living on youtube, they have aome great vids about a fruitarian diet.

People on this board will tell you its unhealthy but they are not right.

Humans where ment to eat fruit.

What whole raw foods are apealing to humans? Fruit, hence we are ment to eat fruit.

>>37833795

Sorry I ment sweet natural living.

https://youtu.be/w77IyOYpEH4

Watch this vid, everythinf he says makes sense, there are no arguments against his logic.

If anyone can refute his ideas ill be glad to hear it.

File: drgreger.png (212KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 500x500px

>>37833795
Cultivated fruit is a far cry from what existed even a thousand years ago. This guy advises against entirely fruitarian diets.

File: Screenshot_2016-07-04-11-33-38.png (406KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 480x800px

>>37833795
>what whole raw foods are apealing to humans? Fruit, hence we are ment to eat fruit.
This has to be bait.
Not even vegans are this retarded

File: 1458599183787.jpg (6KB, 227x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 227x225px

>>37832282
try it. a friend of mine lost his mind and went raw vegan cos of 'impurities', started distilling his own water and shit like that. he's been on a fruit-only diet for a couple of years. does a week of only mangoes, and then a week of nothing but papayas. one week he only ate figs. he's still alive but he's even more mental now and skinny as fuck. wouldn't recommend it t b h but give it a go, post results

>>37833841

Fruits today are bigger and sweeter then thousands of years ago, so a fruitarian diet is even better today then it was.

>>37833843

Whqt fruits occuring whole and raw in nature do you find apealing?

There is only one answer and that is fruits, this is your bodys way of telling you what to eat.

Just like the tiger thinks a deer is sweet, we find fruit sweet.

We were evolved to eat fruits.

Dont forget to supplement b12, like all vegans should.

Multivitamins is unnecessary, just b12 is enough.

File: 1464376843762.gif (4MB, 276x240px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 276x240px

>>37833859
>more sugar
>better

>lots of discounted bruised/ripe bananas the other day
>freezer entirely filled with frozen bananas
>endless nicecream

>>37833870
This is either amazing bait, or you're too fucking stupid to know that "nice taste" is not a gauge of adequate nutrition.

Fucking retarded hippies.

>>37833830
Two minutes in and I had to shut it off
Meat is edible raw
Cooking does change some properties

Just because we crave something does not mean we should eat it constantly or consistently. Fruit is so appealing because it's a ton of sugar. Sugar is energy rich. Energy rich foods were so important because we were trying to survive and any amount of energy was beneficial. So we developed a taste for sweet things. That's why fats taste so good as well. The idea also applies to salt. Salt tastes great and can be eaten in its raw state, yet we will die if we drink saltwater in place of regular water

>>37833870
raw fish and shellfish are delicious faggot

>>37833870
Tigers find deer sweet? Where did you hear this? They find it appealing, yeah, but sweet isn't the only appealing flavor

>>37834021
>typing the same thing that many times
fucking morran

I eat too much fruit. It's just so tasty and so many things are in season and super cheap right now. Every day I'm currently eating 1 banana, 1 apple, 1 cup of strawberries, 1 cup of cherries, 1/2 cup blueberries, 1/2 cup raspberries. Some days I'll also have a mango or a cup of pineapple chunks. Pls halp.

File: 1464818350073.jpg (32KB, 450x410px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 450x410px

>>37834068
>Thinking that that is much

>>37834068
you must do nice smooth poos with that sort of diet

>>37833878

Whole fruits contain not only sugar but also fibers, water, vitamins and bioactive substances.

Because of this whole fruits do not cause a insulin spike like table sugar does.

The form in which your sugar comes dictates if its bad for you, sugar from whole fruits is not bad.

>>37833999

I ment apealing, you know what I mean.

Animals like the foods they evolved to eat, its evolutions way of telling you what to eat.

>>37833949

You find a raw shellfish delicous?

Do you like the way it looks?

Do you like the way it smells?

Are you able to open and eat raw shellfish with your hands and teeth?

Our hands and teeth were evolved to open and eat fruit, not seafruit.

>>37832287
>>37832298
Free sugars gives diabeetus, sugars naturally occurring in fruit is harmless. Do you even WHO

>>37832282
Proteins? Removing any source of protein (including vegetarian ones) = you fucked up
>>37833564
>enough protein
>I'm going to be DYEL and slender
No, stop kidding us and yourself.

I would really like if retarded threads like "Hey guys what if I only eat peanuts/water/tofu/meat/bananas" resulted OP's permaban. There's always either some retarded faggot posting some retarded diet or some kid who doesn't want to eat his veggies or something

VARIED
A
R
I
E
D

DIET
I
E
T

>>37833830
this guy is steadfast. Cooking does change food and breaks it down so its even easier to digest, it can also probably account for helping our brains evolve. Doesn't matter the food either - this effect happens regardless what you put over heat.

we did probably evolve to eat fruit as primates can see the color red, and red is distinct for being able to tell ripe fruit from non ripe fruit. But this doesn't really matter. Humans didn't live in one area, and no two habitats had the same fucking exact foods available. We ate what we could find. So he can fuck off with the fruit only bullshit.

>>37833906

If you crave somthing you should it it, that is your bodys way of telling you what to eat.

A tiger craves deer, we crave fruit.

Sadly in our plastic bubble sugar is ao abundant we mistake fruit cravings fod sugar cravings.

Also cooking does change foods properties, it makes undigestible foods digestible.

The salt argument makes no sense, do you find raw aalt apealing? Would you munch down on a pile of salt?

>>37834183

He argues that humans spread out of their habitat to fast for their bodies to adapt, this way of life we live now is drastically different from where we came from.

Our bodies have not yet evolved to this new environment we created for ourselves.

We eat whatever we can find but what is the most optimal food for us humans?

The answer to that seems to be fruit.

>>37833795
No ... we crave fast energy. Fruit = sugar = fast energy.

>>37834182
>sugars naturally occurring in fruit is harmless.
You're a dipshit. Glucose and fructose in fruit aren't fucking different from glucose and fructose in soda. The ratio of fructose is just higher in fruit than in processed sugar, and the fiber meditates your body's insulin release.

Fruit is good for you, but you can still eat too much of it.

>People on this board actually believe fruits, sugar or carbs give you diabetes
I mean it wasn't a big secret that this board is full of teenager morons who will only believe whatever is opposite the mainstream scientific view, but this certainly takes the cake

>>37834366

Its the same sugars but it comes with vitamins, water, fiber and bioacfive substances.

Eating to much fruit is pretty much impossible.

>>37834104
See
>>37834366
Also
>bioactive substances
Shut up, tree humper.

>>37834366
>You're a dipshit. Glucose and fructose in fruit aren't fucking different from glucose and fructose in soda.
Go read the WHO recommendations AND the publications there cited, edgy kid.

An apple and a coca cola are literally the same thing

>>37834387
Are you dumb? You can eat too much of anything and gain weight and have adverse side effects. Difference with fruit is that you're pumping yourself full of unnecessary sugars.

File: 1423459510649.jpg (145KB, 393x391px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 393x391px

>>37834383
>sugar can't give you diabetes
t. underage

>>37834401

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23789932

>>37834405

I sure hope this is bait, or you must be a burger nvm then.

>>37834402
>cited
Youre literally retarded if you think you cited anything, or could cite anything saying "sugar in fruit is not the same sugar we refine from fruit".

>>37834410

How are augars from fruits unnecessary, you NEED sugars you know, quite a lot of them.

And getting those sugars from fruit it the most optimal.

>>37834445
They are the same sugars but if you refine them you strip them of water, fibers, vitamins and bioactive substances.

That is when they become unhealthy.

What is so hard to understand about his ffs.

File: GI causes obesity.png (258KB, 1348x814px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1348x814px

>>37834419
Show me all the diabetic fruitarians then? Why aren't freelee and durianrider diabetic on a high-sugar diet for over a decade?

How can someone be so easily confused about causality and basic logic? Diabetes means high blood sugar and insulin resistance, that does not mean blood sugar and insulin cause diabetes?
You ever saw that BBC documentary where they put two identical twins on high-fat and high-sugar diets? The high-fat guy was pre-diabetic after 30 days, the high-sugar diet improves his glycemic control. So it's literally the opposite of what some of the uninformed clowns here believe. Carbs are good for you, in any and all shapes and sizes.

>>37834465

I agree with you however I do not think carbs are good for you in all shapes and sizes.

Refined sugar should be avoided at all times.

>>37834445
>Youre literally retarded
It's too hard to google "WHO free sugars", kid?
Do you need me to do that for you?
Do you want me to lecture that for you too?
Grow up a little
First google result

File: BfAvcFG.gif (698KB, 200x113px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 200x113px

>>37834430
Yes, fruits and veggies are good for you.
That doesn't fucking mean a primarily fruit diet is.

These threads always end the same, people arguing for a vegan or even fruitarian diet come with science backed evidence and the. The meatheads just stop replying.

Maybe they are on to something.

steve jobs the apple creator ate a fruit only diet and he died of pancreatic cancer.

ashton kutcher coppied his diet for a bio pic about steve jobs, and only two days into the diet and he was taken to the hospital for pancreatic problems.

this has scared me enough to never try that diet again.

>>37834505

These two people failed so it doesnt work.

>>37834465
>how can someone be so easily confused about causality and basic logic?

>immediate logical fallacy by assuming 4 cherrypicked examples

https://health.clevelandclinic.org/2015/07/fruitarian-diet-is-it-safe-or-really-healthy-for-you/

>>37832282
>LITERALLY only eats fruit

Nigga that's called being a monkey
How the fuck did this monkey learn to type

This is an even funnier bait than the time I saw someone ask how to fit water into their macros.

>>37833706
:D

>>37834457
>>37834465
>>37834487
You people can't possibly be this stupid.

Just because you're getting fiber with the glucose doesn't mean you're not consuming an excess of glucose, you absolute morons. Fruit is a perfectly fine source of sugar in any healthy diet, but a diet consisting primarily of it is a horrible idea.
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/2015/07/fruitarian-diet-is-it-safe-or-really-healthy-for-you/

Fucking christ, this is basic concentration chemistry.

File: 89697563.png (8KB, 473x500px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 473x500px

>>37834492
>found the vegan

>>37832282
b8 thread but i'll answer seriously

people report doing fruitarian diets, and it seems like it is possible (although the diet is MOSTLY fruits, it includes nuts and vegetables). but there is no concrete science on it being okay. it's your body but it could also be your funeral

you're not gonna get fruitarian advice anywhere normal online, go find communities and they'll probably have guides explaining why it's healthy.

but i've very rarely seen vegan bodybuilders. never a raw vegan bodybuilder or fruitarian bodybuilder. don't expect to get jacked because most vegan types end up looking "lean" at most, usually gross.

good luck

>>37834539
>>37834516
>Diabetes: For diabetic or pre-diabetic patients, the fruitarian diet can be dangerous.
It doesn't say anywhere in the link that fruit causes diabetes - because it doesn't. And that's assuming this would be a good source - which it isn't.

>>37832522
You think squatting 5pl8 for a single is a lot of weight.
The reason for this is your worthless life and shitty nutrition.

>>37834560
also keep in mind it's insanely expensive ($20/day i've heard) and i've never seen anybody do it outside somewhere tropical

>>37834539
>I still haven't read the academic publications cited by the World Health Organization
>I know better!
>I don't even bother to perform a simple google search
>let's keep namecalling
I blame summer
It's not like this very argument hasn't been addressed hundreds of times. It's pacific even on this American teen mothers bullettin board

>>37834448
Except when you get your sugars in a simple form and the energy from the foods you're eating are PRIMARILY sugar, you're going to have to eat a lot of sugar in order to meet some kind of daily quota.

Like nuts, fruits are meant to be eaten in moderation. Believe it or not, you can't just shove your face with tangerines because they have "natural sugar" and people say it's healthy. Moderation and balanced diets are what make a diet healthy.

>>37834563
>Walking on a broken foot doesn't cause said broken foot

>>37833706

wait, what? two watermelons really gives 60 g of protein? I didn't think watermelon had any protein in it. Is it counting the seeds or some shit?

>>37834576
>cited
Are you still in grade school? I'm not sure you know what that means.
http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/is-fructose-bad-for-you-201104262425

>>37834593
it's natural fucking sugar you absolute retard, it's not the same as the chemical shit you find in processed foods and junk foods

I bet you're a fucking meat eater

File: maxresdefault.jpg (263KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1920x1080px

>anything wrong with having a 95-100% fruit diet

No, it's fine if you want to look like a hobo with shitty breath

>>37834638
Most foods have protein, but not necessarily much of it. We're talking 15 lbs of watermelon here.

>>37834650
>I'll post yet another completely irrelevant reply
>I won't look up the WHO reports on free sugars
>I won't look up the academic citations in the WHO's papers
Yes, it's summer.

>>37834675
When shaven and groomed they just look dyel

File: bam.gif (1MB, 230x172px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 230x172px

>>37832282
This CANDY ASS with a spoiled child's SWEET TOOTH is LITERALLY dying of MALNUTRITION while CHAD eats PIZZA with vegetables, meat, eggs, dairy, and NACHOS.

>>37834650
Garbage source, literally some incompetent moron writing a blog post about falling for the Taubes scam (Lustig and Taubes are basically the same person). Lustig is a scam artist ,and the most hilarious part about that piece is that it just barely hints at the massive logical flaw - the notion that fructose is bad because it turns into fat, therefore we should replace fructose with fat (which is, in fact, what Lustig, Ludwig, Taubes, Mozaffarian and all these other fuckers are promoting). If fructose is bad because it turns to fatty acids then why the fuck should we be loading up on fatty acids? Saturated fat turns to liver fat, we already know this 100%, it's a hundred times worse than fructose, even if we assume the fructose bullshit (which is bullshit)

>>37834652
Refined sugar isn't any worse for you than natural sugar. BOTH are fine provided you get enough nutrients in your diet in total. Refined sugars are a fine choice for athletes with high carb intake needs, not so much for sedentary individuals who probably already have trouble getting enough fiber, potassium etc.

>>37834716
>calls study on fructose irellevant in context of fruit sugar
>literally can not post the nonexistant WHO source that would magically invalidate all actual sources present in the thread
/sides/

>>37834675
kek the friend i was talking about here >>37833855
looks exactly like those guys. maybe a bit skinnier.

>>37832540
>bananas are obviously healthier then eggs
You have nothing to back this up
Go bait somewhere else


Also eggs are delicious if you add plants

>>37834738
It's the first result on google. If you can't google, I won't hold your hands through your pathetic attempts at summer shitposting, kid.

>>37834738
>actual sources
where? you didn't even read the "sources" you posted, did you? literally blog tier and almost invariably irrelevant to the core of the object
you still don't know what's a free sugar

>>37834752
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/sugar-guideline/en/
Your "first result" says we should eat less sugar.

>>37834759
>hurr if I eat sugar with vitamins i can eat as much as I want
kys

>>37834782
>I haven't read the WHO recommendation linked on that very page
>I'll keep shitposting
Your intellectual dishonesty doesn't warrant an answer.
>The WHO guideline does not refer to the sugars in fresh fruits and vegetables, and sugars naturally present in milk, because there is no reported evidence of adverse effects of consuming these sugars.
And there's a comfy pdf linked on that very page as well
>http://www.who.int/entity/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en/index.html
Start reading page 1.
Since you're a retard and you can't read more than one page at once, the reason why free sugars != intrinsic sugar is synthesized in the second paragraph of http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/11/14-031114.pdf
I won't ask you to check the academic papers since you're an high schooler and you won't be able to sort this out. Also you're not really interested in getting an informed opinion, only in shitposting.
The distinction between free sugars and sugars in fruit has been addressed already (check the archives) and it's pacific on this inane board too.

>>37832522
Some deficiencies are more dire than others and the need for different nutrients changes based on age. Magnesium for example becomes very important after age 30 and lack of it can lead to heart arrhythmia and stroke. I've also noticed a lot of things I would consider junk seem to be fortified with something.

>>37832492
>Or other nuts
Lmao.

>>37832631
kek

>>37832528
This desu --- his fruititarian diet is one of the contributing factors of his pancreatic cancer

>>37834239
I don't think you understand evolution as well as you think you do, buddy.

>>37832492
You should be fine, go for it bro

>>37834465
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCqCsh71eOXZrwqj3oYGfqlg

>>37834675
>>37834742
>>37834718

Healthy does not mean huge, being skinny is often associated with long lives.

>>37832452
>>37832298
Aren't there fruits with protein? They're are veggies like peas that have protein are there any fruits like that?
Or OP could just have a strawberry flavored protein shake

>>37836156
>Aren't there fruits with protein?

No, at least not anything sufficient for a human. Protein shakes could maybe at least solve protein deficiencies but you'd still have other issues.

>>37836156
B12
1
2

Enjoy your hallucinations and cancer

>>37834068
That's nothing, and there is no too much unless it's making you fat or broke.

>>37836156
Every whole food contains protein and some of each essential amino acid. Last I checked, the lowest protein fruits have 4% of calories as protein.

LOL at vegans getting BTFO.

>>37835435
I've also noticed a lot of things I would consider junk seem to be fortified with something.
This, most processed foods are fortified somewhat, it's why you don't have tons of people in the first world dying of deficiencies despite most people eating like shit. When switching to an all-natural diet you actually have to do some research since the government is no longer holding your hand.

>>37832282

Well If you're an average joe you might get enough nutrients to be relatively healthy. But you might lack some minerals and vitamins, things like b12, zinc, iron, calcium and iodine. Maybe adding multivitamins would solve that problem, maybe not, it's just not as effective, specially long term.

Also if you want to actually be /fit/ you're gonna need more protein. You could try protein powders, and just blend them with fruit and water. And the same goes for things like oats, seeds and what not, if you really dislike the taste, just blend them with a ton of fruit.

But anyways, you'll probably die young.

>>37834182

Insulin resistance gives diabetes, sugar is just the middleman. The particulars of why your blood sugar is elevated (fruit, soda, bread) are irrelevant when your fat and muscles no longer respond to insulin. Do YOU even WHO?

>>37834182

Fuck me, I just read your WHO link, it literally says "free sugars are [sugars] added to foods by the manufacturer, cooks or consumer and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates."

AND SUGARS NATURALLY PRESENT IN HONEYS, SYRUPS, FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES

File: cb3.jpg (31KB, 532x720px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 532x720px

>>37834951
>sugar is only bad if it's added sugar
>this source saying added sugar is bad proves that

>>37838632
It's irrelevant anyway because no form of sugar is harmful to health. The WHO defines free sugars not based on health effects but based on whether or not they are part of a food that provides significant amounts of other nutrients. If you include bananas in your diet, they contribute fiber and micronutrients, as well as satiety. For honey and maple syrup that's not the case, even though these are "naturally occurring".

I don't see why you couldn't. I mean you could use protein whey isolate to get your protein needs as well. 1g per lb is bullshit anyway, it's .5-.75 per lean body mass. 3-5 scoops will do ya.

>>37832282
What's with all the retards on fit today?
Jesus christ

>>37832282
Yeah you'll shit your guts out and experience 24 7 anal leakage

>>37832282
The Raw till 4 diet is just a bunch of quackery made up by bogan Aussies for profit. Sure, it's POSSIBLE but it takes a ridiculous amount of micromanagement to get some nutrients like lysine or calcium in enough quantity on a fruitarian diet. It'll also take you literally all day to eat enough fruit to meet your caloric needs. And the cost is obscene. LOL. But buy Freelee and Durianrider's e-books!

>>37838672
Are you, like, literal twelve? Those sources say that free sugars (that is, not just added sugars) are bad, AND intrinsic sugars are never bad

>>37838632
>>37838490

>>AND SUGARS NATURALLY PRESENT IN HONEYS, SYRUPS, FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES
yes, and from your excitement I guess you can't read more than one sentence at once

Dear God, there's the short version for retards like you here >>37834951
>Since you're a retard and you can't read more than one page at once, the reason why free sugars != intrinsic sugar is synthesized in the second paragraph of http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/11/14-031114.pdf

File: 1437806324294.jpg (80KB, 400x369px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 400x369px

>>37838686
>The WHO defines free sugars not based on health effects but based on whether or not they are part of a food that provides significant amounts of other nutrients.
Just staph, it's literally the OPPOSITE you inane mouth breather
The considere HEALTH effects ONLY, diabeetus/cavities/obesity first of all

File: 03e.png (26KB, 603x222px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 603x222px

>>37840143
>AND intrinsic sugars are never bad
You're either illiterate, or laughing your ass off right now.

File: fuck off.png (130KB, 595x842px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 595x842px

>>37840231
>I can't fucking read
>not even the short version for retards
KYS

>>37840296
Fructose in excess of glycogen replacemnt causes steatohepatitis regardless of what it's packaged with.

Deal. With. It.

>>37840296
Are you literally fucking autistic?
>hurr you digest plants slower so it's impossible to get too much sugar from fruit hurrrrr

>>37840326
>steatohepatitis IS CAUSED by intrinsic, unrefined sugars
put wikipedia down and go back to high school.
>>37840365
>I won't read shit
fuck off

>>37834068
Hi mom, I didn't know you brosed /fit/ too!!

File: 1311949083856.jpg (55KB, 486x409px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 486x409px

>>37840413
>"sugar from whole fruit takes longer to enter the bloodstream than free sugar"
>if you read it, you'd know that less fruit sugar enters the bloodstream!
All those bananas are ruining your brain.

>>37841585
some fruits have significantly lower GI (and GL) than oatmeal

>>37841851
GI is nonsense pushed by fat diabetic carbphobes. GI is irrelevant because changes in blood glucose have no negative effects in healthy people (non-diabetics). Don't fall for their fraud. Americans as a group are so fucking fat and diabetic that they actually fail to appreciate that some people are not diabetic and are thus in a position to eat a banana without their leg falling off. What a sad bunch.

>>37841900
>fat and diabetic
>carbphobe

Pick one.

>>37833643
hahahahahahah

> Bananas are obviously healthier than eggs

>>37834448
Carbs in general aren't necessary. This is really a basic concept in any nutrition class. Your body can come up with energy by using fats and proteins, some of which the body need anyways because they are essential and not produced without outside sources. On the other hand, carbs are not essential like certain fatty acids or amino acids, but it doesn't mean that we shouldn't eat them.

>>37832282
>Anything wrong with having a 95-100% fruit diet if I take a multivitamin?

Rapid death is the only downside I can think of.

>go for it

>>37845092
You're retarded.
Carbs complete half the atp chain
If there is none then your muscle is broken down to form the missing link in the atp chain
Because if glucose falls nerves can die
Carbs form your glucose bby
Going no carb is called going keto

The people from WHO have invaded /fit/ and want us all to become Freelee then Banana girl.