>6'2 (188cm) without shoes >152lbs (70kg). So you

>6'2"
>152 lbs

Fuck off man. You're not lean you're skeletor. Get to 200lbs then we'll talk.

>>37484168
read the sticky, gentle newfag

>>37484168
It's called being skinnyfat.
You've been undereating for a while so your body clinged to any fat reserves it had and used up muscles instead.
Just bulk to at least 200lbs at your height while also lifting.
By lifting I mean actually going to the gym at least 3 times a week and using barbells and dumbbells. Don't fall for the machine circuit routine trap 99% of trainers give new trainees on their first day to the gym.

File: 1418552727838.jpg (6KB, 150x251px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 150x251px

>>37484168
>bit of a belly.
>188cm and 70kg

>>37484231
i wouldnt say i've been undereating. I always eat until im full

>>37484290
If you are 152lbs at 6'2" then you have been undereating.
One of the most common fallacies when talking about nutrition is people underestimating or overestimating how much they eat.
Check out some fat hate threads on here for instance, in a huge number of the posts you'll see hamplanets complaining about how they can't lose weight despite allegedly massively cutting down their food intake. Fact of the matter is that unless you're counting calories or have experience counting your calories in the past you can not accurately assess how much energy you are actually taking in.
My recommendation for a bulk: Calculate your TDEE and add +300-500 to that. That's how much you'll be eating every day.

>>37484430
pic related is me

>>37484603
shoo shoo skeleton

>>37484603
It's like all the muscle from your upper body melted and on their way down to your belly they became fat

Amazing, really

>>37484603
You're already skinnyfat with 0 muscle, might as well bulk

Not OP but..

If you see can see ur ribs when you lift ur arms above your head should u be able to see abs?

I cant see shit and i have such low bf do i just have underdeveloped ab muscles?