IS this a top tier transformation?? https://www.instagram.co

>>37221639
Roided out to hell

>>37221648
I don't think shes running that much gear

>>37221648
>Roided out to hell
The insecurity on this fapanese spank forum never ceases to amaze me

>>37221719
Bitch is built like a tank bro

>>37221787
Doesn't mean roids. She's just been bulking since she was a child.

>>37221787
She was 300 lbs.

Now she is sub 200.

The frame is still there.

But to a sub 200 lb twink like yourself, I'm sure she seems big and scary.

>>37221860
Thank you for the twink ;^)

>>37221639

I needed to see this tonight..
Thanks OP.

>>37221639
>IS this a top tier transformation?

yes. bitch is /fit/ approved and DTF for appropriate candidates. top tier response to HAES/fatlogic in every venue

>>37222563
np

>>37221648
Fuck RIGHT off. She's not even big.

Enough butthurt.

Just admit she's hot /fit/.

File: 2016-05-19_145245.png (813KB, 931x594px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 931x594px

>>37221719
>>37221830
>>37223316
the time between is 3 years, females have about 15 - 18 times LESS testosterone then men

if this was a guy in a cbt thread you'd call out roids
>female
>exploding quads
>8 months
>natty

>>37223793
>if this was a guy in a cbt you'd call roids
Lel no. Not all of us are scrawny little cunts who feel the need to project our failures onto other people t b h f a m

File: 2016-05-19_150224.png (10KB, 491x498px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 491x498px

>>37223825
it's obviously roids, you're just white knighting
but whatever, keep being delusional to all your favourite instagram celebs

>A study of elite athlete (some admitted steroid users and some not) combined with an analysis of 20 Mr. America contest winners from the 1939-1959 pre-steroid era, determined that a fat free mass index of 25 is pretty much an upper limit for someone who does not use steroids. A fat free mass of 19 is the average for males.

>>37223892
She's not 15% bodyfat you idiot. There's where you're wrong.

>>37223984
you think she's higher than 15%? I don't, lowering it will only put her higher

>>37223998
She's mid to low 20's. 15% on a female is stage conditions. Next time you try to claim roids on someone, at least have /some/ idea of what you're talking about. Christ.

File: 2016-05-19_151838.png (10KB, 604x502px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 604x502px

>>37224021
even at 25% she's higher than the average male limit after 3 years

>>37224059
Of course she has more mass than the average male, the average male doesn't lift. Are you stupid or just dumb?

>>37224059

Natty limit is more 25 though.