I've recently been trying my hand at javascript canvase

Bump damn it.

File: iranian girl.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

nigga what the fuck is the y axis on that bar graph

>>36989372
No y-axis yet, but it's percent of your RDA. The red line is 100%.. but since that's what sticks out to you most, that'll be changed in the next patch.

>>36989235
where are you getting your data and how accurate is that data?

>>36989547
Right now I'm mining it from nutritiondata.self.com. I'm eventually going to change to a nutrition composition database and you'll have to search for the food.

As for the RDAs, wikipedia.

File: cara_pensive.jpg (56KB, 600x550px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x550px

Overall good idea, shit execution so far
>literal garbage on mobile thanks to fucking Bootstrap
>wasting bandwith on Bootstrap
>putting a picture of a fucking salad in the background
>not sourcing nutrient goals for weight/sex
>not using USDA nutrient database so you have more than 20 fucking foods
>increments of 10 g for each food, no textbox
>JUST

File: smug jude.jpg (166KB, 1200x1156px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1200x1156px

>>36989589
>"mining"
>copy pasted 2 dozen nutrition data facts from self.com

I wasted 35kb of data for this

Op bout to be a millionaire mang

seriosuly OP, fix this >>36989599 shit and report back. Shouldn't take you more than like 10 days if you're even mildly competent

>>36989599
What do you mean by sourcing nutrient goals for weight/sex?

80% of the other stuff you listed is on my to-do list, I'm just using this as an oppurtunity to arrange that to-do list.

>>36989641
Actually, it should take me about 3-4 days, but I need like 1 day rest.

>>36989614
Haha, no... there's a nutrientData object on every list I basically console.logged the necessary parts.

>>36989235
This is pointless dude. There's a ton of variation in the vitamin contents of food based on growing conditions and preparation. Those numbers you see online are just averages to give to give you a rough estimate. Just eat a variety of whole foods and that's all you need.

>>36989704
I know, I wouldn't say it's pointless though.

>>36989669
meaning how did you arrive at those numbers but you answered that here >>36989589

ppl will wonder where you got it, so just put that in there somewhere

>>36989704
Then you could use the tool to give an "average" indication. It can still serve as a basic indicator.

I'd like to see ranges on it though. Since the data are averages, there should really be something simple like a range 2 standard deviations wide (one in each direction).

>>36989793
That's a good idea, but it might be impossible since nutrient composition databases most likely don't contain that info.

>>36989827
then you should seek out whatever source these databases are relying on. Somewhere someone did the actual measurement and if it's a legitimate source they will have report deviation.