>you post a pic of you and your girl >this guy comments

We're talking years (or never) natty, because damn that vascularity.
Or cycle on and off for a couple of months

>how much time to achieve his body?

infinity if natty

>>36916968
Not really.

>>36916937
Get really defensive and embarrass myself as usual.

File: comradedoge.jpg (98KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 400x400px

>>36916937
y-you too

>>36916937
exactly 10 years

>>36916937
No idea about the time but I'd never be with a girl.
I do cardio and bodyweight almost exclusively and I'm gay.

That's why I browse fit so much.

>>36916937
6+ years

Probably two years, his physique is not that impressive if you consider how much professional lighting plus black-white photography will do for your look

Who is this guy and how much does he squat?

>>36916951

I could get like this if I did cardio but I'm kind of lazy in that regard.

u jelly?

>>36916968
let's first see a picture without photography-grade favourable lighting and in colour.

>>36918432
basically this desu!!!!

>>36916937
whats so funny hipster?

i like fighting

His body looks great in that photo.
I'm natty, in good lighting, with a pump, especially after a fast, I look that good. 9 times out of 10 I don't.
I've been training for 6 years, I'm reasonably strong (though not at my strongest because I've been cutting hard). I would say, for the sake of photographs, his body is achievable natty, and if you nail the diet and train with consistency, I would say it's achievable natty in 3-4 years.
If you're talking about that as your default body, I'm skeptical that it could be achieved natty, but I could be wrong.

>>36918432
>>36920423
>projecting