Am I being meme'd by this frozen fruit? >100g = 62 calories

File: 222222222.jpg (339KB, 784x1045px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 784x1045px

>100g = 39 calories
>150g = 62 calories

File: 33333333333.jpg (383KB, 784x1045px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 784x1045px

>100g = 70 calories
>150g = 84 calories

File: 444444444444.jpg (339KB, 784x1045px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 784x1045px

>100g = 53 calories
>150g = 80 calories


Did they seriously fuck the macros up on all their products?

What is the correct figure here? Im confused.

>>36540164
They're different fruits you fucking moron!

>>36540389
........thats not what im asking noob.

Look at the calories for 150g serve vs 100g

They don't match up.

>>36540422
first one matched up
they probably used a calorimeter or something and for some reason when they burnt 150g it gave relatively less cals then when they burnt 100g

just go full autism and average the 2 and use that number :)

>Coles
Go woolies mate.

>>36540164
It's probably rounded you mong, 62.4*1.5=93.8

>>36541081
Then why does my myfitnesspal say otherwise?

I put 100g and it gives me 70 calories (which is correct)

Then I put it to 150g and instead of saying 84 calories, it says 105 calories.

WHY?

Talking about this >>36540188 the raspberries

>>36541098
Did you even pay attention during primary school at all?
100/2=50 and 70/2=35.
100+50=150 and 70+35=105.

File: Explain this to me.jpg (412KB, 1924x1136px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1924x1136px

>>36541116
explain this to me please

>>36541153
The package is wrong.

>>36541159
I knew it.

I think im going give Coles a call to tell them about this.

Fucking gains goblins.

>>36541188
Yesthe first one was rounded as I said but the other one is objectively wrong