How does it feel knowing this body type attracts more males than

Doesn't really make any difference either way since no amount of lifting will ever make my face not ugly

You're right but for the wrong reason. It's literally all about the face.

>>36455505
>>36455508
On average, homosexual men find muscular bodies more attractive than women do. Women think /fit/ guys are too intimidating and gross. You're better off selling your weights and turning into a tubby tompson.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgsoJWXchp8

>>36455535
Again I find this having very little relevance in my life since my face will never un-ugly itself either way. Besides you probably shouldn't present conclusions you draw from a youtube video as facts

File: 1451325402116.jpg (49KB, 479x435px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 479x435px

>>36455535
>Listening to what woman *say* they want

>>36455491
That's why it's the /fit/ goal body famalam

File: Henry-Cavill-workout1[1].jpg (27KB, 638x425px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 638x425px

Don't care. Still goal bod.

File: 1435666078080.gif (2MB, 218x233px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 218x233px

>>36455535
perfect :^)

>>36455491
OP, are you attempting to commit as many logical fallacies as possible in one sentence or something? If so then you're succeeding incredibly well.
>Identifying a false cause and effect (post hoc ergo propter hoc)
>Selectively using facts (card-stacking)
>Making false or misleading comparisons (false equivalence and false analogy)
>Generalizing quickly and sloppily (hasty generalization)
Can you even walk and chew gum at the same time? I have a hard time believing you can.

>>36455491

>using /fit/
>wanting to fuck women

newfag

File: 8bitlaughingman.gif (204KB, 404x416px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 404x416px

>>36455491

>Lifting to get women

>>36455508
>It's literally all about the

social dominance.

>>36455508
>>36458324
Money trumps both of these though.