Don't 'roid, /fit/. You are gonna make it. Don't

are you implying that it's impossible to look like that natty?

>>36357790
If you cut 6-8 months and maintain it for a week then bulk up again, maybe

anything longer than that and he's on roids

>>36357774
>>36357790
I honestly believe that's natty. I've seen guys I know for a fact are natty who look nearly that good at peak. I'm not too far off that natty, either, training for body building.

File: Transform-1024x1024.jpg (79KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 600x600px

Same guy. He says it took him 7 years.

>>36357774
>>36357848
totally possible natty. and he's only 5'11.
and i'd say he's more around 10%bf on OPs picture.

>>36357848

Looks plausible.

File: 1307635613002.png (113KB, 219x281px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 219x281px

That is what a great natty looks like.

I don't quite see what's there to doubt.

>>36357790
holy shit wtf are you talking about

many natties are more impressive than that natty. He looks great though, don't me wrong

>>36357774
It's not impossible if you have GOAT genes

>>36357848
>>36357774
Looks perfectly possible natty.

>>36358008
you need to learn how to read.

>many natties are more impressive than that natty.
and write, apparently.

>>36357848
>7 years natty to look like a guy on 1 cycle

>>36357848
Doesn't look like it's the same guy desu. Definitely achievable natty.

File: 1440514158540.png (603KB, 581x639px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 581x639px

He looks super full for his weight and height.

He's probably frauding height but don't really doubt him being natty.if he's only that lean like a month or two out of the year.

if he normally sits at 11-12% it's completely believable.

File: Untitled.jpg (84KB, 427x514px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 427x514px

>>36357774
>5ft 11
>175lbs
>contest ready

to be quite honest with you my familiars, he fits in gh15's liar guide

>>36357774
I'd say he's probably natural

He's big but well-proportioned and realistically so

Not to say 90% of fuckers won't look like him without gear or years of hard work

>>36358096
>5'10 172

God this is accurate. I've never bulked passed 172 and kept the muscle off a bulk. There is no 180 cut at 5'10 lol.

>>36358096
what

a) he's below the weight in your chart
b) he's still gonna lose like 10lbs for a competition

>>36357774

Weird; I'm near the same height, and am about 25 pounds lighter. Despite this, I look the same, if not better, than this.

>>36358040
>It's not impossible if you don't have shit as fuck genetics and if you do things right*