How does /fit/ feel about inverted rows? They seem much

>>35235559
inverted rows are great for that square chest gains bro

>>35235559
Arguably, sure. But how do you really weight them without cursing your chest?
Look into barbell chest support rows or seal rows. It's a row where you lay chest on a bench and row the barbell underneath.

No lower back stress, a lot more weight.

>>35235578
As they become harder you can shift your body and further spread your arms rather than adding weight

>>35235596
That will do jack shit and eventually reduce the range of motion so you're actually doing less.

>>35235578
tucked leg lever rows, real lever rows. still max out at bodyweight.

>>35235578
>But how do you really weight them

>>35235596
>you can shift your body and further spread your arms
Also elevating feet, start doing the eccentric portion one handed, then move onto one handed for the entire movement and you can start holding a dumbbell in your off hand.

I think they're great. The bar/table should ideally be at hip height though.

>>35235578
Start doing pull ups. Then do one armed pull ups.

>>35236327
Slightly different, that's now shifted from a horizontal plane pull to a vertical plane pull. Your progressions would be into a front lever, as weighting such a motion is pretty difficult.

>>35235559
Better for your back than what? Everything? They aren't bad but bodyweight rows won't take you anywhere far. If you want results you would have to add weight or switch to a harder variation ex: front lever rows

File: 1331910510495.gif (320KB, 300x169px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 300x169px

>>35235596
>falling for the wide grip anything meme
Less weight with a lower range of motion, great idea.