Rebuild by needles? I like these shirts, but I'm pretty sure you could DIY the same for much cheaper
>>12741559
looks good on a girl probably. I think all the shirt sizes put together will form this ugly silhouette for men.
>>12741559
the whole brand is a bit fucked to be honest and some of the shit they do is just plain retarded
>let's combine the two most popular surplus to fashion items ever
>woah cool idea
except it renders the iconic m-65 pockets completely unpractical due to the fit of ma1 basically loosing the utilitarian aspect of the two military items altogether
and in general it's just really uninspired, on paper it sounds like a cool concept but the complete lack of any design process (or that's what it seems at least) just kills it, there is no catch to it, nothing to 'get', no thought out details and design choices
just makes me bit sad honestly cause the brand could be something amazing but as it stands it's just
>let's take this and that and throw em together
>yeah sure whatever
>>12741559
>I'm pretty sure you could DIY the same for much cheaper
That could be said for literally any garment. Of course if you do shit yourself instead of buying retail from a brand it'll cost you less.
>>12741839
>literally any garment
nah, lot of clothing uses techniques that range from hard to impossible to do at home and lot of the hard ones are simply not worth the money and time you have to pour in
fuck, you absolutely can not DIY simple H&M garments for cheaper at home just because how low they offer them, fabric alone costs too much if you live in the west
but needles, you can because the prices are really high and it's 'rebuild' items as the name implies
some of the ribbon flannel cws are very good
pants are usually on point too
some of their stuff is retarded though