Are puma's material quality good given that they are at

File: i01pf754501s.jpg (244KB, 1764x2217px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1764x2217px

Have pic. for 3 years. They really pick dust so need to use washing machine every 2 weeks or so.

File: PUMA RUN.png (195KB, 384x600px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 384x600px

>>12678094
>... they ["PUMA"] are at the bottom of the big brands...

1. DEFINE "AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BIG BRANDS".

2. REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU MEAN BY THAT, I DO NOT THINK SO; THE FACT THAT IT IS NOT THE LABEL OF CHOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL PROSTITUTES ("CELEBRITIES"), DOES NOT ENTAIL THAT IT IS QUALITATIVELY LESSER.

File: PUMA YOUTH A.png (128KB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 500x279px

SILENT PUMA —NO MOTTO.

>>12678361
post image of shoes after 70+ washes please

>>12678094
Puma is on the come up. As long as you dont buy the asian/Indian mong items they really have some nice stuff

>>12678094
athlete here, puma is my go to brand for sports, quality is great and price is wallet friendly witch is nice.

>>12679750
sorry for my english, is not good, im japanese.

>>12679750
Your english is fine

File: 768x1024-5ehttp-s3-eu-west-1-amazonaws-com-ee-elleuk-rihanna-puma-art-direct-april-2015-puma-twitter-blog-jpg.jpg (109KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 768x1024px

>>12678902
>REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU MEAN BY THAT, I DO NOT THINK SO; THE FACT THAT IT IS NOT THE LABEL OF CHOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL PROSTITUTES ("CELEBRITIES"), DOES NOT ENTAIL THAT IT IS QUALITATIVELY LESSER.

File: 389C01E500000578-0-image-m-28_1474377295562.jpg (52KB, 634x560px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 634x560px

>>12680460

The last pair I bought was in 2010. They fell apart in one month of daily wear

File: 66-62337-16ss_rt_k-jenner_fierce-white_0902_rgb-1-1459465920.jpg (55KB, 1000x537px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1000x537px

>>12680462

It sucks. Not for ALL of their models but most feel really cheaply done.