Thoughts? are they worth £250? Would they fall apart after wearing

File: v2.png (44KB, 403x164px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 403x164px

>>12591187

File: v3.png (57KB, 368x189px)

57KB, 368x189px

>>12591187

All pics of them

>>12591187
They look shit

>>12591198
I'm sorta mixed between thinking they look good as fuck to they look shit as fuck, can't make my mind up

>>12591187
>>12591190
>>12591195
Are you a flamboyant gay man or a big time drug dealer?


If not, avoid.

>>12591210
Neither but got a few quid to waste, and yeah probably gonna avoid and just buy a different pair

>>12591187
I mean they most likely won't fall apart

It's ok to not try to be /fa/ all the time because /fa/'s a bunch of autists, you can have guilty pleasures

>>12591210
correct. if you're not a flaming homo, a drug dealer, at least black or colin mcgregor, you will look ridiculous in these shoes.

gold eyelets and obnoxious branding make them pleb-tier; people will also think you're a major tool

very loud, and works contrary to the intended purpose of a nice white, luxury leather sneaker, imo, which is minimal simplicity & sophistication.

pass for sure, much better options out there. this screams, "I have money, bad taste, and nothing interesting to say"

Get the givency court. Nice white sneakers and you won't be wearing common plebs like everyone else

>>12591228
>colin mcgregor

>>12591224
Yeah I hear you lmao, someone will rag on how shit something looks then a month later be wearing it

>>12591230
Got any shoes like this that you can recommend?

>>12591236
Just had a look through some, some look really good desu thanks for recommending

File: 1412851971913.jpg (45KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 645x773px

>>12591258
when you're real real good at beating people up for a living you can wear ostentatious shit.

it's a universal truth.

File: sc.jpg (8KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 225x225px

>>12591228
>colin

>>12591187
> paying this much for fucking clothes
are you ok?

>>12591278
kek. fuck I actually forgot his name was Conor. kek. And I'm a sports fan. baka


Not that the fight with Mayweather has anything do do with sport

>>12591285

>Being poor

I'll take a large #1 with fries, pleb

But seriously, I'm about to cop some Gucci horsebit

>>12591310
>Gucci horsebit
being poor

you must be worth thousands

kek

>>12591310
Has nothing to do with being poor, these shoes look like absolute horseshit and all you pay for is having some shitty logo on them. There's no reason to pay this much for clothes if they don't give you a practical advantage over cheaper alternatives.

>>12591323
not that anon, and I think the shoes are vulgar, but you're out of mind.

Clothing/fashion inherently has/have antithetical considerations that extend beyond practicality or utility.

You wouldn't hire a house painter to do a fine art painting would you?

A talented designer's time alone can and should effect the cost of an item.

>>12591323
>this is the state of /fa/

>>12591310

>being hood rich

>>12591270

they're just white sneakers

budget route: white on white Adiddas stan smiths

there's no real limit here and most designers make a nice pair

if you want some stealth wealth pairs: common projects, balenciaga, saint laurent, rag & bone

just avoid metal eyelets, it evokes the converse imagea nd just makes leather luxury pairs looks cheap

this versace pair looks like a cheap pair of guess sneakers because they're so gaudy

>>12591331
That's not what I said, there's no reason to pay unreasonable amounts of money for a look that you could get way cheaper, except if it adds any practical advantage over the cheaper alternative. The products you choose being "original" adds literally nothing to the look itself. People who pay hundreds for white sneakers and thousands for plain black tshirts are out of their mind, not me.

>>12591323
>There's no reason to pay this much for clothes if they don't give you a practical advantage over cheaper alternatives.

I own 5 pairs of allen edmonds and two luxury sneakers.
you're right -- for clothes fit & function & fabric > branding; 99% of the time.


but shoes?
nah senpai, they're totally worth it. not only do they look great, tie outfits together, but im ready for any outing casual or formal that comes my way.

my shoe warddrobe can handle all the way up to tuxedo formality right down to a beer with the bros. and they'll all last 5-10 years +

>>12591351
Expense is an inherently relative concept anon.

>>12591417
Relative to what, the capital you have access to? Capital doesn't change anything about there being no fucking reason to buy these products.

>>12591425
You sound like George 'these hip musicians with their complicated shoes' Costanza with an added streak of highly unattractive self righteousness.