ITT : shitty /sp/ memes you fell for pic related. horrible

If /sp/ made you buy why the fuck are you complaining here. Go to /sp/

>>12590912
/heem/ here and I am laughing at you.

at least i got mine at nordstrom rack for like $42 ayyyyyy

File: IMG_2238.jpg (146KB, 644x460px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 644x460px

>dressed by /sp/
You're not gonna make it.

>horrible materials and creasing on first wear.

Even nappa leather on my CPs & EU leather on my SLP SL01s have creased within one or two wears

My Allen edmonds crease, even with the perfect fit, within two or three wears

it's part of the sprezzatura of leather shoes.

The key is to use leather lotion and light cleaning when they start to look dilapidated & always keep them in cedar shoe trees. that's what helps them keep form and age well (and prevent wear creases from becoming cracks)

tl;dr OPs a pleb

You should have got the butter soft

>>12591181
Are those the exact same as the ssense ones for 80 that looked more cream?

Oh shit I just bought these. Got em for $40 though. Is that bad?

>>12591940
No you didnt

>>12591181
>>12591940
didn't get the right ones kek

>>12591940
>>12591181
>when you fall for the meme but still buy the wrong shoes

o i am laffin

>>12592011
>>12592025
>>12592034
Is it cause they're not butter soft or whatever? I don't like that color, so I got em in white. They look the same as the others though. Is there a difference in quality?

File: AR0456_WGN.jpg (14KB, 470x470px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 470x470px

>>12592222
The ones that /fa/ likes to meme people into buying are the ones in the OP. They have this off white/vintage look that this board loves to jerk off

You probably bought pic related. They dont have the off white/yellowish sole and the tongue say "Reebok classic" instead of just rebook. As far as I know they're literally the exact same shoe otherwise. You just bought a boring white sneaker when theres plenty of other options

Tfw no shell cordovan sneakers

>>12592244
I see. Thanks, Anon.

>>12590937
being a sneaker expert doesn't make you effay, Schaub

I got op photo with the cream some for $45 off Nordstrom rack. Yes they are the exact ones. I think they're great shoes. The materials are retro. I see that oj/yellow foam in the padding that I never see anymore. Not extraordinarily comfy but I played tennis fine in them.

>>12591191
Sergio looks like an socially awkward IT student here.

>>12592025
>>12592034

They were the Ivory Chalk ones... so yes, they were the cream off-white ones.
Didn't get meme'd into spending $120 CAN on them mafuckas, so Nordstrom rack had a sale that I copped from.

Stay hatin'

>>12594089
paying more than 40 dollars for these shit shoes is not worth it

>>12594117
they're literally on the same level of quality as my adidas sambas and gazelles

What's your deal, man?

>>12592011
>>12592025
>>12592034

sorry you slow nerds didn't catch this shoe's thread a month ago and caught the rack clearance
https://www.nordstromrack.com/shop/product/2040453?color=CHALK-PAPERWHITE-GLEN%20GRE

File: git gud.png (86KB, 1073x445px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1073x445px

>>12594209
sorry your slow ass didnt get them when they were $30 bucks


dumbass

>>12594259
shut up, fart mouth

anybody want to sell a size 11?

File: CLUBCWHW.jpg (46KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 630x630px

>>12590912
womens version

same colorway just blue instead of green reebok logo on sale for $30

c/n?

https://www.shoebacca.com/reebok-club-c-85-vintage-v69406.html?CATARGETID=120280160000327260&CAWELAID=120280160000320753&cadevice=c

>>12590937
Watching the UFC is nothing to be proud of anon

>>12595235
cop

Fuck me for having big feet. I'm an 13/13.5 in womens sizes

>>12590912
I have these in blue, they're really comfortable. I also have stan smiths which hurt my feet.

>>12590937

Fuck off, Brendan. Just because Travis Browne fucked you up and stole your girlfriend doesn't mean you have to act tough over 4chan.

>>12594259
>SIZE 12

uncommon sizes often get good prices
find me size 10

>>12596655
>uncommon
12 is around the average in your country.

>>12596657
>US size 12
>average

>>12596662
even 10 is below average in the US aka manlet size

>>12596665
There's a huge difference between size 10 and size 12. I wouldn't advice copping for cheaper in 1.5-2 sizes too big. You look like a poor schmuck in clown shoes.

>>12596668
still uncommon unless you live in a manlet country. The average 6 foot tall person usually has a shoe size over 10.