Are the rick Owens addidas shoes actually decent running shoes?

>>12583097
>high fashion shoes
>decent for running
I don't know why you'd ever think that

>>12583098
Why would they call it a runway if you weren't going to run or fastening if you weren't going to go fast

every single adidas collab comes with a piece of paper in the box that literally tells you not to run in them

File: IMG_0231.jpg (30KB, 468x264px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 468x264px

>>12583110
THEN WHY ARE THEY CALLED RUNNERS?
I just want to look cute in the gym

>>12583129
Why do you want to look cute when you'll be sweating, grunting, farting, and probably sporting a squat-induced erection.

Nothing looks good at the gym except muscles.

Because they took the design of shoes intended for running and accessorized the shit out of it. Its like how bomber jackets were intended for pilots who bombed people, but are now different and fashionable. actually bombed people.

>>12583110

Is that true? Can you prove it? It wouldn't surprise me if it were true.

My tech runners are extremely comfortable, I've heard a lot of rick shoes are.

No.

Try runners warehouse and look at the sales, they are very good and you will get real running shoes. ricks stuff, like dries and all the rest is made to be worn but also cherished. its art after all, form before function.