how is anyone supposed to wear this shit? He unironically will

File: 1472342294229.jpg (152KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 640x720px

unpopular opinion here but high fashion and expensive designer brands are fucking retarded, thats why

there's nothing fashionable about being a walking billboard for some company

>>12037158
What how are you a walking billboard for wearing lets say Raf and not uniqlo?
also i might be stupid but can you word what you're trying to say a bit better?
>>12037158
Also op you are a pleb

>>12037246
if you are buying something for the brand sake and not the look of the clothing you are a pleb

Like if you wouldn't buy a £50 jacket but you would spend £500 on it because it has some brands name on it you are a pleb

File: undercover_052_383.jpg (67KB, 383x495px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 383x495px

>>12037254
But where does high fashion brands come into play?
Most high fashion brands do not even use obvious/visible logotypes?
Please give me one example of a high fashion brand that is not in the gucci/LV/Chanel/ category that consistently produces heavily/obviously branded clothing?

also i would argue there is nothing wrong with branding even though i dont like it myself as having pic related for example could be seen paying homage to jun takahashi just as wearing a velvet underground tee could be seen as homage to the velvet underground

>>12037183
austist