Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: bape-rips-off-adidas-stan-smith-bape-sta-morning-star-01-620x435.jpg (22KB, 620x435px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 620x435px
Why does Bape feel the need to be unoriginal and blatantly rip off other brands' designs? They know they're doing this, they do it on purpose and it's retarded. Mainly because the fact that you're ripping off another brand and calling it "remixing" is unprofessional and fucking stupid. If they really like those designs, why not do a collaboration instead of just doing what they want? Please speak in on this, I want to hear opinions!
>>
Nigs gon nig I suppose
>>
>>11967134
>bape
>nigs
it's by japs
>>
File: IMG_4228.jpg (58KB, 600x664px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 600x664px
I'm not sure, it's not like they have a problem with collabing, supreme/puma/coke/other big brands x bape etc.
To be honest though, I am eyeing a pair of these and thinking about getting them, so I'm not too bothered.
>>
You make no mention of Hender Scheme doing this. Why mention Bape doing it?
>>11967228
Hong Kong-ians now (too?).
>>
>>11968378
Hender scheme are considerably higher quality than their origin. Bape literally bought converse shoes, removed the logo and swapped with bape'd logos
>>
they're not ripping it off, you fucking idiot. Ripping off the design would mean they expect you to think theirs is the original. Knowing their consumer base + the iconic nature of these designs, it's pretty safe to say just about every person who sees them will recognize the reference, which it what they rely on. I don't like to say this to people very often, but you literally just don't get it.
>>
File: d1306e38cf99b7b2a23501a2d361234b.png (231KB, 758x696px) Image search:
[Google]
231KB, 758x696px
wow how dare they
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3