Are my headphones effay? I'll likely never wear them outside

File: Shure840and440.jpg (109KB, 600x327px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 600x327px

How does it look wearing studio style headphones outside?

File: Audeze-LCD-3-High-Performance-Headphones.jpg (63KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x640px

>>11396029
>speaking of headphones for autists
there's no way anyone would ever go outside in one of these though

>>11395927
Kitchen countertops are very fashionable, yes.

>>11396049
lmao
I think they could do ok in some campy 90s fits though, they might not look good but they look different, and they're fairly light for the size

>>11396037
awkward and kind of uncomfortable for me
I've always prefered IEMs for outside use

>>11395927
Jesus christ you sad fucks, continuously asking whether everything is 'effay' why do you need acknowledgement from a group of sheep on an autistic forum, like okay outfits and clothes i understand, but headphones? and especially when you say you never wear them outside. Buy what you want or ask on /mu/ or /g/ for headphone advice you robot

>>11396085
lol chill the fuck out dude, this was mostly intended as a shitpost and to spark some debate on effay headphones
you don't honestly think I bought these for the looks?

>>11396029
That thing is pretty big, do you seriously wear that outside?

Just curious. I own one but never even think about bringing it outside.

>>11395927
¨just get black earbuds bud

>>11396335
doesn't anthony fantano use these headphones?
I think they're even larger than mu sennheiers, but at least they're closed back

File: image.jpg (118KB, 831x399px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 831x399px

I got some sennheiser momentums

>>11396478
on-ear and over-ear momentums are beautiful, but IEMs basically never look stunning

File: final3.jpg (212KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1200x800px

>>11396493
*maybe except for some final audio pieces

File: p1020768.jpg (1MB, 2558x1684px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2558x1684px

what about my vintage high end headphoes?

>>11396521
not sure if I'd call 100$ high-end...

Audio-Technica makes the best quality shit

>>11396521
>>11396556
also not really vintage since they still produce them, afaik

probably the most common studio monitors in the world

File: DCM_02122213_1.jpg (487KB, 2937x2203px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 2937x2203px

r8 my cans /fa/

File: 535.png (2MB, 733x976px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 733x976px

>inb4 shave your shit

>>11397593
W2C K-on equalizer

>>11397593
fucking retard posting this same image for years, lmfao

File: 2802186_01L.jpg (19KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x300px

They're the unholy child of earbuds and headphones and I love them

>>11397636
how can that be when I only got the DAC last year xmas?

File: ultrasone edition 8.jpg (62KB, 800x644px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x644px

>>11397593
cool understated yet attractive headphones
pretty popular models too, especially the ATH

if I'm ever extremely rich, these may just be my public-wearing headphones

File: 24.jpg (3MB, 2818x2013px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2818x2013px

I have MDR V6's. Highly recommend them for durability and comfort.
They have a classic professional studio monitor look (they are), which I really like.

I sort of hate when headphones look too fashionable, I feel like if they look too nice they probably don't sound that great. I know that's not always true but it's just the feeling I get for some reason.

File: sennm3.jpg (98KB, 600x452px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 600x452px

>>11397710
I know that feel. to me headphones look best when they have that studio look but are obviously made of luxurious materials like real leather and and wood
the momentums are nice fashionable looking headphones for outdoor use, but of course the audi quality for the price could be better

know any effay amps?

File: FinalAudio.jpg (409KB, 600x1314px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 600x1314px

Imo there are extremely few good looking headphones. i think headphone designs only work when they use perfect circles, not ovals. like
>>11396082
>>11396045 (but obviously no sane person is going to wear these outdoors)

and pic related
Unfortunately pic related are literally form over function
There doesn't seem to be a middle ground

File: title-1000x520.jpg (31KB, 1000x520px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 1000x520px

Recently got these Jays q-jays

Best I've ever used

File: SENHD600_000.jpg (28KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x300px

>>11397977
I checked out the cheapest model of these when I was buying headphones last month
the sound was nice if a little bright and fatiguing for my taste (soundstage was especially impressive) but they're really heavy and uncomfortable, in the end I bought the Sennheiser HD600 which by contrast is very comfy but looks kinda shit

I honestly have no idea who would ever buy 5000$ headphones that are this uncomfortable

File: D3S_6991-cord-1200.jpg (278KB, 1200x1723px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1200x1723px

>>11397977
I always though beyerdynamics had nice looking headphones

File: image.jpg (127KB, 800x1100px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 800x1100px

>>11398015
yeah those look pretty good
But aren't Beyer Dynamics supposed to have a kind of unique sound that is sort of love-hate?

>>11398028
they're supposedly really detailed but with fatiguing treble
didn't try them out since I have sensitive ears and I like my treble smooth

I like my Momentums. Outside of some Audio Technica models, probably the only decent looking on/over cans for mobile use that still sound good.

I have 595s and some other random closed headphones for use at home. Used to use Grados, but they're uncomfortable as all hell.