What do you think about my new shoes (Clark's Originals)?

>>11341399
WHY DON'T YOU FORM YOUR OWN FUCKING OPNION INSTEAD OF ASKING STRANGERS ON THE INTERNET

>>11341399
you shouldn't pay more than 50 or 60 dollars
they're definitely sturdy aside from the crepe sole wearing down, but they look average at best and leather isn't very nice. tough though

>>11341399
I liked the bushacre2 look better, got those instead.

>>11341399
generic autism boots

look like shit

>>11341559
bushacre's leather is even shittier than the already shit db

>>11341580
But you get nicer soles that won't look like literal brown shit after a year and will last much longer.

>>11341399
op, I have a pair of sand suede ones. I love them. If they're worth 130$, then that's what matters. They're a staple in any wardrobe.

>>11341673
crepe soles actually feel better until they're wore down, bushacre soles are literally shit colored anyway

to each their own i guess, i wouldn't spend the money for either of them

>>11341777
Oh, I saw those too and loved them, but most of my clothes wont match them

honest opinion: underrated in the sense that they're good boots but mfa has fucking ruined them forever
goddamn normies

>>11341852 what are you, a 12 year old child?
if all it takes to ruin them is for some other internet tribe to endorse them then they aren't very good after all

>>11341777
staple in a boring faggot's wardrobe

>>11341399
yes they will be good after some weeks of wear.

>>11341852
It wasn't mfa though, /fa/ had a giant giant boner for them until like 2 years ago

gay/cuck
>$130
lol

>>11342638
What do you wear? Fucking Vans? Go back to 4th grade