where do you think you fall on the scale, /fa/? where would

Early adopter/early majority

too poor to become an innovator because I have to wait for sales

>>11105453
what's your aesthetic like

what do you think innovators are wearing currently

Early adopter. I wouldn't say I'm innovative but I experiment a bit.

All of /fa/ fits into the late majority group or the laggard group. This has always been true. This will always be true.

>>11104984
laggard

I'm just picking up roshes and janoskis now famabam. Might move on to stan smiths in the next year or so

Past laggards, I am the true hipster.

File: 1457151958715.gif (2MB, 320x384px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x384px

>>11105823

>>11104984
This board likes to think it's 'innovative' or an 'early adopter' of trends, but it's been shit for the last 3 years. The idiots here just don't want to admit that the board hasn't been relevant and is dying.

I'd argue that MFA is ahead of this shitfest now.

>>11105813
p much this

/fa/'s usually late as fuck when it comes to already established trends, i guess it depends where you live though, living in the city gives you a greater chance at being an early adopter/early majority. critical mass is zara/h&m tier i assume like monochrome and """"minimalism"""" atm and there still hasn't been a strong backlash/rebound style on here

>>11105858
I think it has less to do with location and more to do with the average age of people on /fa/. Most of the people here are simply too young to be up on new trends.

>>11105836
/mfa/ is just fashion standard
not even innovative or early adopter

File: 1458747036610.jpg (2MB, 1936x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1936x2592px

>>11105892

>too young to be up on new trends

>>11105925

you look like a clown. this is awful even if it's a le ironic funnee joke fit haha get it, i look bad?

>>11105925
BOY IF YOU DON'T

>>11105938

>too new to even realize this was one of stances' fits from 2014

>>11105956

okay? it still looks bad, even if it's a joke. even if it's a repost. even if it's from 2008. on this forum we discuss and post clothing. clothing was posted, i discussed it.

it being from 2014 changes nothing.

>>11105759
>what's your aesthetic like
minimalistic i guess, i like to combine luxury pieces with casual clothing

honestly i probably fall into early majority but people cant dress for shit where i live so im considered a rare dresser

>>11106053
>i probably fall into early majority
Not even close.

>>11106100
ok

someone please post what innovators are wearing so I'm ahead of everyone

>>11106214
>>11106100

honestly its kinda hard to rate where everything is.

i would probably put vetements/gosha/ looking poor core as early majority

and minimalist clothing/extremely clean silhouettes safe color pallets as late majority.

it seems like color is coming back into style but I have no idea what the early adopters and innovators are wearing atm.

i am beyond time

>>11104984
>mfw being an *extreme* laggard, due to cyclic nature of fashion, makes you de facto innovator

I'm late/laggard, still in school and try to save money when I can. Sometimes I can score some really sweet deals, but I also dress like a normie so it isn't difficult

Where are you suppose to go if you want to know what would be considered "early adopters" fashion?

>>11106789
if you have to ask you don't deserve to know