Looking to cop a pair of Shoes Like Pottery
Anyone have experience with these? Quality? Sizing?
why would you want to overpay for what is literally converse
>>10990330
(sputtering) It's Japanese thoooo.
>>10990056
i've had my pair for 2 years and it's still great
>>10990376
do they looked trashed like most converse do after two years?
and did you find that they run tts?
>>10990330
They're uglier than converse and have more obnoxious branding too. Can't see the appeal at all.
>>10990384
J A P A N
E X C L U S I V E
N O C O N T R A S T S T I T C H I N G
>>10990056
I'd say there a hell of lot nicer than the 70's converse. I didn't pay retail, but I guess I wouldn't really regret it if I did.
>>10990056
same fit as chucks???
>>10990392
>being exclusive to some Asian island being a plus
also
Chuck IIs don't have contrast stitching.
>>10990447
i like the sole but the blue wad of gum on the outside is off-putting. does it come off?
>>10990383
Not him, but I find that they run a half size large. Not sure what you're asking with the first question though, any shoe will look trash if you don't take care of it.
>>10990523
that blue logo is so gross, stands out like a /r9k/ at a party
>>10990662
So, they fit like chucks?
>>10990662
The problem is that they don't even come in half size increments. I would usually wear an 11 but I can't order a 10.5
>>10990676
They're exactly like chucks..
Get Doeks if you hate the branding. It's made by the same company.
>>10990686
First hand experience? I already order the same size as my Chuck's
>>10990056
they're like converse and sturdier.
I think they're sturdier because of the vulcanized gimmick that they're throwing but idc, worth it imo