why are 90% of attractive men 7/10? and why are 70% of men

because your mind is bent

because we're not allowed to wear makeup

and this thread has nothing to do with fashion at all so fuck off

>>10744853
I'm at least an 8/10 male, and i'm being humble.

The amount of "you're a handsome young man" i get off my grandmother is off the charts. I'm Destined for great things anon, it must suck to not be me.

>>10744853
>why are 90% of attractive men 7/10?
ive been thinking this myself actually

>>10744853
because it takes 6% body fat, the right height, the right amount of money in your bank account, the right age all in the right balance and combination to get the final 3 points

I'm at least an 9/10 male, and i'm being humble.

The amount of "you're a sexy man" i get off my female classmates is off the charts. I'm Destined for amazing things anon, it must suck to not be me.

File: kill me then yourself.png (438KB, 615x446px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 615x446px

>>10746040
>>10745015

is this a little ol pasta that I've missed out on?

Isn't that kind of a subjective rating?

One person's idea of a 7/10 might be another's idea of a 5/10.

>>10746316
Humans and even babies have a general idea of what is attractive and what isn't

>>10746319
Yeah but a number system out of 10 isn't very accurate.

>>10746330
What's a better system?

>>10746333
Fuck or not

>>10746338
Tbh yeah

>>10746319
Babies are humans you bumbling idiot

>>10747426
that's what he said

>>10746316
It's really subjective. My housemate does psychology and had some girls over to do an experiment where they'd be shown pictures of guys and they'd have to rate them while holding a mug of hot or cold water.

The girls ratings were random and strange, like less than average but not ugly guys would be rated 2s and those with conventionally attractive features (good jawline etc) didn't always get good ratings.

Basically girls have no real idea of what good looking guys look like

>>10747749
Isn't the conventional wisdom that most women prioritize a lot of things over looks?

>>10747426
Babies are NOT humans. They are like weird, noisy earthworms.

because men are naturally uglier. masculine features only work in certain ways but feminine features look good on men and women majority of the time

>>10744853

youd be surprised but physically attractive people actually have less kids
they also are less likely to even have kids in the first place

>>10747754
Confidence and status, likely.

it's because you're insecure

File: 1421269225100.jpg (95KB, 450x640px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 450x640px

>>10747893
how interesting. source?

also i'm easily a 8/10.

>>10745336
lol

>>10747426
>autism
Pretty sure he was trying to say that babies (who haven't been affected by social conditioning) still know what is attracted and what isn't.

File: clap.gif (195KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 320x240px

>>10745336
Well said Anon.

>>10744853
I'm at least 3/4 male and I'm being mumble.

The amount of "your a handsome young ehm..." I get from my 50yo korean boyfriend is off the chairs. I'm Dsquared for great thighs anon, I must suck so I can be me.