This gif is what brought me to /d/. I'd prefer to be the

>>6943967
i came

Trap, crossdressing, snowballing/eating cum, sissification... Have fun.

>>6944181
Stop falsely using the term sissification. That's just a french maid outfit. A sissy maid outfit is way different.

>>6943967
post 4 more things that are relevant to your thread please.

You're a queer who likes wearing girls clothing. To sum it up, you're gay.

File: 9Cloud.us_0063_Majalis31.jpg (436KB, 819x1184px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 819x1184px

Another one of my favs

File: 1359855979534.jpg (231KB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 850x1200px

>>6944216
Sorry anon. Here they are.

>>6944691
>suspender belt OVER panties

No.

>>6944212
I can picture you in a skimpy maid dress yelling "I-I am NOT a sissy!"

>>6944713
and that would be true. I'd be crossdressing. I hate it when people misuse terms. I love sissy stuff, and when I search for it I don't want to see half-assed "you love big black cock" texts and pictures of skimpy maid outfits and bikinis. That's just being a faggot.

well honestly it seems like you like shota, but that is taboo for some reason on this board. if you want that on 4chan it has to be on /b/, but there are plenty of other places to get it that aren't as shit.

>>6944695
Do you have another pics of this?

>>6944958
ok so what's the textbook definition of sissy then

>>6945020
Sissy is something that is overtly-feminine on purpose. Think gaudy fabrics like silk and satin, and an amount of frills and bows that'd make a grade-school princess go "I wouldn't wear that!". Sissies love hyper-feminine things.

>>6944958
How can one be crossdressing when clothing has no gender.

>>6943967
In a word: Traps
Try twinks when you get used to fapping to traps, then eventually full on guys.

>>6945012
I'm sorry. I do not and a don't know source.

>>6945879
I've already fallen for the twinks somewhat. Anyone know where I can get quality twink fap material? I'm having trouble finding good stuff.

File: e895eeff6922225e604398428538e704.jpg (540KB, 661x920px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 661x920px

>>6944962
Now that I take a second look, you're right anon. I do like shota. Wow, didn't know that about myself. But am I a pedophile if I want to be the questionably underaged boy getting fucked in the maid outfit?

>>6946182
Absolutely. They're called Catamites, which was popular in Rome, Ancient Greece, and currently in the Middle East.

>>6946182
I'd be a bit more worried if you started thinking about real boys that way.

File: 56562703_p11.png (2MB, 2000x1493px)

2MB, 2000x1493px

>have a feminine build and enough of an androgynous face that people sometimes can't tell my gender at a glance
>have always liked the idea of crossdressing
>tfw lately I've been having fantasies of a bunch of bigger men having their way with me as they please
>images like >>6944696 and pic related really turn me on now

But then after fapping I remember that trying it out in real life would most likely lead to getting a bunch of STDs. Oh well.

>>6945012
>>6946063
Source is InCase, I don't remember if there's more to that particular scene.

>>6948115
I don't know about a bunch at the same time, but taking some basic precautions goes a long way, such as not just blindly arranging a gangbang via cl.

Having finally gotten around to giving in to my fantasies and hooked up with some older guys who've used me from time to time as a fucktoy was the best decsion I ever made for my sex life. Only regret is not doing it sooner. I'm bi so I still go for women, but sometimes I just need to be the slutty cumdump for a while. Not having to wonder what it's like and actually experiencing it has been immensely fulfilling even if it's just a small part of the shenanigans I get up to.

>>6948115
>>6948115
I'm straight and I have never had a homosexual affair, but I have to say that being a cumpdumpster for a bunch of handsome guys is one of my fantasies.

Tie me in a way everyone can use and abuse me, lock me in chastity, hood me and dress me cutely (maid, lingerie, shimazake cosplay or just a collar and a leash) and I'll enjoy being treated cruelly and fucked roughly with no mercy and being tortured as the lowest of fuckmeats.

I'm glad I maybe could someday fullfil my fantasie like >>6948227

File: 02_cover.png (4MB, 4322x3034px)

4MB, 4322x3034px

>>6948293
sure, but if you actually got close to doing it in RL you'd realize you arent a cute shota in a dress and be instantly revolted

Would I buy a trap cybernetic body? yeah, fuck yeah

>>6948348
I'll probably do it anyways if I'm well shaved and in the circumstances I previously stated. I only need the bu nch of guy to be sadistic and mercilessly.

>>6946204
man i read some articles about catamites because you mentioned it and i feel really disgusted (but sadly kinda wish I was one right now)

>>6948364
Pray you dont come across me
I'd drug you up and dick you so hard you wouldn't be certain if you were crying from pain or pleasure

86kg 174cm squat 140kg etc

>>6948380
You woudn't need to drug me. I'll probably submit voluntarily under those circumstances. My fantasies go deeper than that.

>86kg 174cm squat 140kg etc
The hell does this mean?

>>6948115
Start crossdressing you little faggot

Then take pcitures and post them here

Bumpin

>>6945310
is this safe to save?

File: good_stuff.gif (941KB, 748x567px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 748x567px

This is also my fantasy.
I get aroused instantly with that kind of images, imagining myself as the one receiving it.

>>6943967
Traps and crossdressing mainly. You're a sub like a lot of us so you're probably into gentle femdom too. Just look for hentai about traps, crossdressing, and of course tomgirls (guys that look like girls)

>>6948115
Just go to those fetish chat room sites. You can role play as a trap with people, it's hot as fuck. You'll have to ignore a lot of curries though that can't understand you're not into them.

>>6951892
Dude it's art, as long as you aren't in some bullshit country pushing conservative shit then you're fine

>>6952557
>le ebil conservatives
stop talking about politics outside of /pol/, you just make yourself sound like a moron.

>tfw want to be a trap but I'm 5'11" and too skinny + not really androgynous enough
Life is suffering.

>>6945201
>How did it end up like this
It was only a kiss
It was only a kiss

>>6945112
Maybe that's how *you* define the term, but that certainly isn't any annotative definition of the term. Especially in a fetish or sexual context.

Why do most of these images look like toddlers?

Is every single jap gay artist a pedo?

File: 5d186fe1cab57c9a0e98b9d544799784.jpg (492KB, 900x1272px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 900x1272px

>>6954421
okay wise guy, then tell me how do I only search for stuff like this ( https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/2e/41/81/2e4181d1ab915159dee53ac26d5aed52.jpg ) with no dicks, skimpy bikinis, naked petite boys, or gay activities involved? My fetish is for clothing, I get off on these, and these outfits are purely made for fetish and sexual content. Do pray tell how the link above is the same thing as this one >>6948115

>>6954421
>definitions are subjective
Off yourself m8

>>6955602
aaand R.I.P. thread.

>>6955602
What is this 3DPD shit doing on /d/

>>6945221
>>6945232

Oh man I haven't fapped to Bridget in years, thanks

>>6955602
>3D
Dropped.

>>6944081
Of course you did.

>>6945223
>>6945224
>>6945239
>>6945243
Artist? This stuff is fucking great

>>6960078
po-ju

File: ur_ghey.jpg (355KB, 781x750px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 781x750px

>>6943967
>This gif is what brought me to /d/. I'd prefer to be the maid myself. What's my fetish?

File: 1415246766676.png (662KB, 1100x1100px)

662KB, 1100x1100px

>>6961764
If i saw a trap like that, I'd hit it. Gay or no.

>>6961766
me 2

>>6952714
It's directly relevant because the politics of the current rulers in a country can directly affect whether one could get in legal trouble for downloading such an image.

>>6955598
You are so right! Now let's go worship Lexicus, the God of Language, who handed down the one and only eternal perfect dictionary at the dawn of time!

>>6945293
I like this

>>6943967
It's called being a fucking faggot.

>>6962288
It's not our fault that you're using wrong words for wrong things. I prefer not to call airplanes boats, but hey, it's subjective.

>>6962380

I'm not that guy but I took the few seconds to follow the train of thought back up the thread, and you're full of shit. Also your analogy sucks, and the reason why it sucks is because your airplane and boat are dumb-simple, obviously distinct concepts, where sissies, traps, trans etc etc are all such clearly closely related and overlapping categories that they approach being indistinguishable.

It also bears mentioning that "sissy" and "trap" are not clinical terms like transsexual or transgender, but are in actual fact quite subjective, which furthermore puts the lie to the earlier faux-indignation (yours?) >>6955598 that someone had, over what are in fact quite new and subjective pieces of slang. "Trap" itself in its present context really got started on 4chan and similar spaces around the time of 4chan's beginning, as effeminite people who tend to have penises (and the trope about such types in anime and manga) became conflated with the Admiral Ackbar quote.

It furthermore bears mentioning that even trans issues in general entail psychology, which is arguably a more "squishy" (to the point of being normative? 'bullshit?) area of intellectual endeavor. The point being that even psychology is easily accused of subjectivity, and thus the words relating to q.t pi people of indeterminite gender or circumstances.

In short, you're full of shit and you are not the Oxford dictionary definition - decider of "trap", "sissy", and so on, and the reason why you are not is because they're squishy new ideas which people are still bitching about. You're welcome to add your own bitchy voice to the conversation but your claim to objectivity about slang is manifestly absurd.

>>6962439
okay, so YOU tell me what words and definitions do I have to use in order to find sissy things that are in no way related to BBC, gay activities, or "just your common crossdressing".

>>6962451

You seem to believe that the relative effectiveness of searching certain phrases on porn websites somehow supports your purported argument that definitions in pornography are objective, settled, fixed. What is funny is that, as we are both connossieurs of pornography, /you yourself already know/ that this is not the case - how many times have you come across some useless or vaguely generic string of words in relation to an image, clip, etc? Admittedly, boorus are a bit better at this at present, /but even they are not fixed and objective and standard/, which is the point (that your conception of things is bullshit). Precisely because pornography and fetishism themselves are historically underground, unscientific, subjective mental enterprises.

Here's the thing. Even if you know know exactly what string of word-forms to put together RIGHT NOW to get EXACTLY the type of porn you want, this is still very far away from being a proof of what you would like to believe that it is. That's the other thing that you're missing. Language, especially language around porn consumption is still subjective, being subcultural language (it is fair to say that pornography consumption is a subculture, even if lots of people participate in it in their idle spare time). And you have countless counter-examples constantly demonstrating the subjectivity of language right in front of you all the time, as you actually search and sift through pornography. You know just as well as I do that pornographic websites, in addition to sometime giving hot, exciting clips, also constantly mislead, misinform, or simply don't label something quite as well as you might think it could be "scientifically, objectively" labeled.

Note that I never said that is is IMPOSSIBLE to quantify and analyze porn -obviously not, since porn businessses must quantify information in order to run. I'm referring the language and discourse around porn. And in porn itself, you already know I'm right.

>>6962490
yes, I know that people like to throw in all the words and not settle on making some standards, which is annoying as all heck. I'll give you that much.

With that said, we SHOULD be trying to make it a standard to treat these words as different (but possibly overlapping) categories. We SHOULD be making them adamant definitions.

>>6962493

Now we've cornered you (since you don't refute) into making the most honest and reasonable statement that you've made thus far. Furthermore, I tacitly have your assent on various points.

In principle I would even agree with what you've just written (since I seem to have forced you to be more reasonable, and to more plainly state your basic attitude which I basically knew all along): standardization is a good thing, which has led to the modern state of affairs, certainly better than the old. We agree.

But let's step back a moment. Get outside of ourselves. We're now having a heated debate about the science of consuming pornography. Are we discussing curing cancer? Ending jihad? Nope, just (in one possible interpretation) how to more effficiently consume porn, say. Is this the best use of 'objectivity', 'science'? There's supposed to be room for mystery and subjectivity in sexytime. That's part of the fun. Porn is the negation of RL sexytime.

At some point, putting standard objective definitions on sexytime becomes off-putting to others, and then they push back on it. A mythological example of what I'm talking about is the old notion of how BDSM subculture evolved in the USA in the middle of the century: gay guys got back from WWII, and they fetishized hyper-masculinity, bondage, and so on. Thus, master/slave relationships, and some (who?) even defined a clear progression from the one to the other. AND NO SWITCHING. Or so the myth goes.

This more rigid, "objective" conception of BDSM subculture eventually gave way to the tumblr hodge-podge of today. This is the "old-guard"/"new-guard", which is itself admittedly a myth. I was at a munch once and this old fuck made a point of telling the room that "there is no such thing as "the old guard", it's all bullshit, don't believe anyone who tells you it's true." What I took him to mean is that it's only ever been individuals in a subculture, and not a STANDARD. I.E. (again!) NOT OBJECTIVE.

>>6962380
You're using the word "thing" outside of its original sense of "assembly meeting", so you're using it wrong.

File: __armin_arlert_and_shimakaze_kantai_collection_and_shingeki_no_kyojin_drawn_by_marimo_danshaku__794d875631f879e32093b45c0149a121.jpg (64KB, 600x816px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x816px

>>6962439
>>6962490
>>6962528

Quit fucking arguing about syntax, get back to posting sweet, sweet traps.

>>6948293
dude
you're
not
straight
holy shit is it so hard.

>>6964324
but also not gay, so actually...

>>6948393
it's his weight, height and how much weight he can squat, obviously

>>6964784
So you're bi.Still not straight. Accept who and what you are

>>6948293
> being a cumdumpster for a bunch of handsome guys is one of my fantasies.
> I'm straight
Nope!

>>6962528
unrelated, not any of the posts you replied to~ whats an email that I reach you to reach to discuss further, conversation pertains to my interest

>>6943967
Traps, twinks, crossdressing, femboys, maybe some form of feminization/genderplay.

Or maybe you're just gay, and repressing it, but girly boys are 'straight' enough that you can rationalize it. Source: It happened to me.

>>6948293
Just FYI, I said exactly the same sort of things for a couple years, and it turns out I'm actually just gay.

File: CpHjPYRWYAA0sf2.jpg (98KB, 636x786px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 636x786px

I'm a chubby avg looking dude.
I wish I could cross dress and wear latex clothing.
But even if I lose weight I'd still be a dude in women's clothing instead of having that amazing look.

>>6965617
How do you manage to look like an antivirus program exactly?