>Lego show
>Only random stuff in the background are lego
For what purpose?
>>95069482
"Fanart"
>>95069482
I want to fuck that blue chick
>>95069622
No, that's actually what It looks like
https://youtu.be/HJBQuPXvVcM
>>95069932
I meant to say porn
>>95069932
I think the anon meat that the Fanart is the purpose.
>>95069482
Because Lego minifigures aren't cute.
>inb4 wyldstyle
It's a show for girls. When lego markets things explicitly for girls they abandon their stylistics because the more utilitarian aesthetic of legos appeals to boys more
Pic related
>>95069482
>voltron artstyle
ew
>>95069482
Is the dude on the right gay?
>>95072405
He's the one guy character in a girl show, so he is by default either the love interest and/or gay.
>>95069482
selling the new lego set.
that is literally it.
>>95069932
this good looking animated wasted on a toy show
>For what purpose
You know why.
>>95069932
That Anon was answering OP's question.
>>95069932
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Elves#2017_Television_series
I thought that art and animation looked too damn familiar
Studio Mir at it again.
show looks like it'll probably be shallow in terms of story and character but I love the art so I may check it out.
>>95069932
Wow they had a big budget for this toy commercial